首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neurologia medico-chirurgica >Hands-on Simulation versus Traditional Video-learning in Teaching Microsurgery Technique
【2h】

Hands-on Simulation versus Traditional Video-learning in Teaching Microsurgery Technique

机译:显微外科技术教学中的动手模拟与传统视频学习

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bench model hands-on learning may be more effective than traditional didactic practice in some surgical fields. However, this has not been reported for microsurgery. Our study objective was to demonstrate the efficacy of bench model hands-on learning in acquiring microsuturing skills. The secondary objective was to evaluate the aptitude for microsurgery based on personality assessment. Eighty-six medical students comprising 62 men and 24 women were randomly assigned to either 20 min of hands-on learning with a bench model simulator or 20 min of video-learning using an instructional video. They then practiced microsuturing for 40 min. Each student then made three knots, and the time to complete the task was recorded. The final products were scored by two independent graders in a blind fashion. All participants then took a personality test, and their microsuture test scores and the time to complete the task were compared. The time to complete the task was significantly shorter in the simulator group than in the video-learning group. The final product scores tended to be higher with simulator-learning than with video-learning, but the difference was not significant. Students with high “extraversion” scores on the personality inventory took a shorter time to complete the suturing test. Simulator-learning was more effective for microsurgery training than video instruction, especially in understanding the procedure. There was a weak association between personality traits and microsurgery skill.
机译:在某些外科领域,基准模型动手学习可能比传统的教学实践更有效。但是,尚未报道显微外科手术。我们的研究目标是证明台式模型动手学习在获得显微缝合技能方面的功效。次要目标是根据人格评估来评估显微手术的能力。随机将包括62名男性和24名女性的86名医学生分配到使用台式模型模拟器进行20分钟的动手学习或使用教学视频进行20分钟的视频学习。然后,他们进行显微缝合40分钟。然后,每个学生打了三个结,并记录了完成任务的时间。最终产品由两名独立的评分员以盲目方式评分。然后,所有参与者都进行了人格测试,并比较了他们的微缝线测试成绩和完成任务的时间。在模拟器组中,完成任务的时间比在视频学习组中明显缩短。在模拟器学习下,最终产品得分往往高于在视频学习下,但差异并不明显。在性格量表上具有高“外向性”分数的学生需要较短的时间来完成缝合测试。相对于视频教学,模拟器学习对显微外科培训更有效,尤其是在理解过程方面。人格特质与显微外科技能之间的联系较弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号