首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Epidemiology and Infection >Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of matching name-based with non-name-based case registries.
【2h】

Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of matching name-based with non-name-based case registries.

机译:估计将基于名称的案例注册表与基于非名称的案例注册表进行匹配的敏感性和特殊性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Because non-name-based case registries have recently been used for reporting human immunodeficiency virus infection, this study attempted to define the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of case registry matches using non-name-based registries. The AIDS, sexually transmitted disease (STD), and tuberculosis (TB) case registries were matched using all available information to establish the standard. The registries were then matched again using five increasingly less specific criteria to compare sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. The registries were then also transformed into non-name-based codes as if they were the HIV registry and matched again. With name-based registries, sensitivities increased as the matching criteria became less exacting, while the accuracy declined slightly. Specificities remained close to 100% due to the relatively small number of matched cases. Results from matches of non-name-based registry matches were similar to those of the name-based registry matches. Non-name reporting can be used for data matching with acceptable accuracy.
机译:由于非基于名称的案例注册表最近已用于报告人类免疫缺陷病毒感染,因此本研究试图使用非基于名称的注册表来定义案例注册表匹配的敏感性,特异性和准确性。使用所有可用信息对艾滋病,性传播疾病(STD)和肺结核(TB)病例注册表进行匹配,以建立标准。然后,使用五个越来越不那么具体的标准再次匹配注册表,以比较敏感性,特异性和准确性。然后,这些注册表也被转换为非基于名称的代码,就好像它们是HIV注册表一样,并再次匹配。对于基于名称的注册管理机构,随着匹配标准变得越来越不严格,敏感度有所提高,而准确性却略有下降。由于匹配病例的数量相对较少,特异性仍接近100%。非基于名称的注册表匹配的匹配结果与基于名称的注册表匹配的相似。非名称报告可用于具有可接受准确性的数据匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号