首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Spine Journal >Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools
【2h】

Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools

机译:观察者之间和观察者内部对Cobb角的可靠性评估:手动与数字测量工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study is to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of end vertebra definition and Cobb angle measurement using printed and digital radiographs of 48 patients with scoliosis. The Cobb angle and the end vertebra were assessed by six observers in 48 patients with scoliosis using printed and digital radiographs. Definition of end vertebra and measurement of the Cobb angle was repeated three times with a 3 week interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities. 95% prediction limits for the errors in measurements are provided. For the Cobb angle a mean ICC of 0.97 was determined for intra- and interobserver reliability measurement of the printed radiographs. For the electronic radiographs a mean ICC value of 0.93 was determined for interobserver reliability and a mean ICC value of 0.96 for intraobserver reliability. Intraobserver ICC for definition of end vertebrae was 0.8 for both methods. Interobserver ICC was 0.83 for the manual and 0.74 in the digital method. One pitfall in angle measurement implies the Cobb method itself which measures in two dimensions. Until we develop a proper tri-dimensional measuring system an error is introduced. For the Cobb angle measurement the definition of end vertebrae introduces the main source of error. Digital radiography does not improve the measurement accuracy.
机译:本研究的目的是使用48例脊柱侧凸患者的印刷和数字X射线照片确定端椎定义和Cobb角测量的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。六名观察员使用印刷的和数字的X射线照片评估了48名脊柱侧弯患者的Cobb角和椎骨末端。以3周的间隔重复三遍定义末梢椎骨和测量Cobb角。类内相关系数(ICC)用于确定观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。提供了测量误差的95%预测极限。对于Cobb角,对于印刷射线照片的观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性测量,确定平均ICC为0.97。对于电子射线照片,观察者间可靠性的平均ICC值为0.93,观察者内可靠性的平均ICC值为0.96。两种方法的椎骨内观察者ICC为0.8。人工观察者的ICC为0.83,数字方式为0.74。角度测量中的一个陷阱意味着Cobb方法本身在二维中进行测量。在我们开发合适的三维测量系统之前,都会引入误差。对于Cobb角测量,端椎的定义引入了主要的误差来源。数字射线照相不能提高测量精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号