首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
【2h】

Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists

机译:在训练有素的资深自行车手中以低强度进行低节奏间隔训练不会改善自行车性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence, and leg strength in veteran cyclists.>Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists [age: 47 ± 6 years, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): 57.9 ± 3.7 ml · kg−1 · min−1] were randomized into two groups, a low cadence training group and a freely chose cadence training group. Respiratory variables, power output, cadence and leg strength were tested before and after a 12 weeks training intervention period. The low cadence training group performed 12 weeks of moderate [73–82% of maximal heart rate (HRmax)] interval training (5 × 6 min) with a cadence of 40 revolutions per min (rpm) two times a week, in addition to their usual training. The freely chosen cadence group added 90 min of training at freely chosen cadence at moderate intensity.>Results: No significant effects of the low cadence training on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, power output, cadence, gross efficiency, or leg strength was found. The freely chosen cadence group significantly improved both VO2max (58.9 ± 2.4 vs. 62.2 ± 3.2 ml · kg−1 · min−1), VO2 consumption at lactate threshold (49.4 ± 3.8 vs. 51.8 ± 3.5 ml · kg−1 · min−1) and during the 30 min performance test (52.8 ± 3.0 vs. 54.7 ± 3.5 ml · kg−1 · min−1), and power output at lactate threshold (284 ± 47 vs. 294 ± 48 W) and during the 30 min performance test (284 ± 42 vs. 297 ± 50 W). Moreover, a significant difference was seen when comparing the change in freely chosen cadence from pre- to post between the groups during the 30 min performance test (2.4 ± 5.0 vs. −2.7 ± 6.2).>Conclusion: Twelve weeks of low cadence (40 rpm) interval training at moderate intensity (73–82% of HRmax) twice a week does not improve aerobic capacity, cycling performance or leg strength in highly trained veteran cyclists. However, adding training at same intensity (% of HRmax) and duration (90 min weekly) at freely chosen cadence seems beneficial for performance and physiological adaptations.
机译:>目的:本研究的目的是研究中等强度的低节奏踏频训练对老骑自行车者的有氧能力,自行车运动,总效率,自由选择的踏频和腿部力量的影响。>方法: 22位训练有素的资深自行车手[年龄:47±6岁,最大耗氧量(VO2max):57.9±3.7 ml·kg -1 ·min -1 ]被随机分为两组,一个低节奏训练组和一个自由选择的节奏训练组。在12周的训练干预期之前和之后测试呼吸变量,功率输出,节奏和腿部力量。低节奏训练组除了每周两次,以每分钟40转的速度进行12周中度[最大心率(HRmax)的73–82%(HRmax)]间隔训练(5×6分钟)他们通常的训练。自由选择的节奏组在中等强度的自由选择的节奏上增加了90分钟的训练。>结果:低节奏的训练对有氧能力,骑自行车性能,功率输出,节奏,总效率,或发现腿部力量。自由选择的节奏组显着改善了VO2max(58.9±2.4 vs. 62.2±3.2 ml·kg -1 ·min -1 ),乳酸阈值时的VO2消耗(49.4) ±3.8 vs. 51.8±3.5 ml·kg −1 ·min -1 )以及30分钟的性能测试(52.8±3.0 vs. 54.7±3.5 ml·kg −1 ·min −1 ),在乳酸阈值下(284±47 vs. 294±48 W)和30分钟性能测试期间的功率输出(284±42)与297±50 W)。此外,在比较30分钟性能测试期间各组之间自由选择的节奏从前到后的变化时,发现了显着差异(2.4±5.0对-2.7±6.2)。>结论:在训练有素的资深骑自行车的人中,每周进行两次以中等强度(HRmax的73-82%)进行的低节奏(40 rpm)间隔训练,不能提高有氧运动能力,自行车性能或腿部力量。但是,以自由选择的节奏添加相同强度(HRmax的百分比)和持续时间(每周90分钟)的训练似乎对性能和生理适应性有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号