首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla
【2h】

A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla

机译:立即将单齿植入物放置在愈合的牙槽和上颌骨拔牙窝中后边缘骨水平的5年比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: The aim of present investigation was to evaluate marginal bone level after 5-year follow-up of implants placed in healed ridges and fresh extraction sockets in maxilla with immediate loading protocol.>Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients in need of a single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla received 42 Astra Tech implants (Astra Tech Implant system™, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden). Implants were placed either in healed ridges (group I) or immediately into fresh extraction sockets (group II). Implants were restored and placed into functional loading immediately by using a prefabricated abutment. Marginal bone level relative to the implant reference point was recorded at implant placement, crown cementation, 12, 36, and 60 months following loading using intra-oral radiographs. Measurements were made on the mesial and distal sides of each implant.>Results: Overall, two implants were lost from the group II, before final crown cementation: they were excluded from the study. The mean change in marginal bone loss (MBL) after implant placement was 0.26 ± 0.161 mm for 1 year, and 0.26 ± 0.171 mm for 3 years, and 0.21 ± 0.185 mm for 5 years in extraction sockets and was 0.26 ± 0.176 mm for 1 year and 0.21 ± 0.175 mm for 3 years, and 0.19 ± 0.172 mm for 5 years in healed ridges group. Significant reduction of marginal bone was more pronounced in implants inserted in healed ridges (P < 0.041) compared to fresh surgical extraction sockets (P < 0.540). Significant MBL was observed on the mesial side of the implant after cementation of the provisional (P < 0.007) and after 12 months (P < 0.034) compared to the distal side which remained stable for 3 and 5 years observation period.>Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, responses of local bone to immediately loaded implants placed either in extraction sockets or healed ridges were similar. Functional loading technique by using prefabricated abutment placed during the surgery time seems to maintain marginal bone around implant in both healed and fresh extraction sites.
机译:>目的:本研究的目的是评估采用立即加载方案放置在愈合脊柱和新鲜拔牙窝中的植入物进行5年随访后的边缘骨水平。>材料和方法: 36例需要在上颌前骨中进行单颗牙齿置换的患者接受了42例Astra Tech植入物(Astra Tech Implant system™,Dentsply植入物,瑞典莫恩达尔,瑞典)。将植入物放在愈合的脊中(I组)或立即放入新鲜的拔牙窝中(II组)。修复种植体,并使用预制基台立即将其置于功能负载中。使用口腔内X光片在植入后12个月,36个月和60个月植入种植体,牙冠骨水泥记录相对于种植体参考点的边缘骨水平。在每个种植体的内侧和远端进行测量。>结果:总体而言,第二组中的两个种植体在最终牙冠骨水泥固结之前丢失了:将它们从研究中排除。植入种植体后1年的边缘骨丢失(MBL)的平均变化为0.26±0.161 mm(3年),0.26±0.171 mm(3年),拔牙窝5年为0.21±0.185 mm,1年为0.26±0.176 mm(1)愈合脊椎组3年为0.21±0.175 mm,5年为0.19±0.172 mm。与新鲜的手术拔牙窝相比,在愈合的脊中插入的种植体中,边缘骨的明显减少更为显着(P <0.041)。临时固定后(P <0.007)和12个月(P <0.034)后,在植入物的内侧部分观察到了显着的MBL,而远端侧则保持了3年和5年的观察期。>结论::在这项研究的局限性内,局部骨头对放置在拔牙窝或愈合中的即刻加载的种植体的反应相似。通过使用在手术期间放置的预制基台的功能性加载技术似乎可以在愈合的和新鲜的拔除部位保持种植体周围的边缘骨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号