首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical History >The Chemistry of Famine: Nutritional Controversies and the Irish Famine c.1845–7
【2h】

The Chemistry of Famine: Nutritional Controversies and the Irish Famine c.1845–7

机译:饥荒的化学:营养争议和爱尔兰饥荒约1845–7年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The activities of Irish medical practitioners in relieving the impact of the Irish Famine (c.1845–52) have been well documented. However, analysis of the function of contemporary medico-scientific ideas relating to food has remained mostly absent from Famine historiography. This is surprising, given the burgeoning influence of Liebigian chemistry and the rising social prominence of nutritional science in the 1840s. Within this article, I argue that the Famine opened up avenues for advocates of the social value of nutritional science to engage with politico-economic discussion regarding Irish dietary, social and economic transformation. Nutritional science was prominent within the activities of the Scientific Commission, the Central Board of Health and in debates regarding soup kitchen schemes. However, the practical inefficacy of many scientific suggestions resulted in public associations being forged between nutritional science and the inefficiencies of state relief policy, whilst emergent tensions between the state, science and the public encouraged scientists in Ireland to gradually distance themselves from state-sponsored relief practices.
机译:爱尔兰医务人员为减轻爱尔兰饥荒的影响而开展的活动(约1845年至52年)已得到充分记录。但是,有关饥荒的史学研究基本上没有分析与食物有关的当代医学科学思想的功能。鉴于Liebigian化学的迅速发展的影响以及1840年代营养科学在社会中日益突出的地位,这令人惊讶。在本文中,我认为饥荒为营养科学社会价值的倡导者打开了途径,以参与有关爱尔兰饮食,社会和经济转型的政治经济讨论。在科学委员会,中央卫生局的活动以及有关汤厨房计划的辩论中,营养科学尤为突出。但是,许多科学建议实际上无效,导致营养科学与州救济政策的低效率之间建立了公共联系,而州,科学和公众之间出现的紧张关系则促使爱尔兰的科学家逐渐远离州资助的救济实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号