首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >The use of a policy dialogue to facilitate evidence-informed policy development for improved access to care: the case of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS)
【2h】

The use of a policy dialogue to facilitate evidence-informed policy development for improved access to care: the case of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS)

机译:通过政策对话促进以证据为依据的政策制定以改善就医机会:温尼伯中央医疗服务局(WCIS)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPolicy dialogues are critical for developing responsive, effective, sustainable, evidence-informed policy. Our multidisciplinary team, including researchers, physicians and senior decision-makers, comprehensively evaluated The Winnipeg Central Intake Service, a single-entry model in Winnipeg, Manitoba, to improve patient access to hip/knee replacement surgery. We used the evaluation findings to develop five evidence-informed policy directions to help improve access to scheduled clinical services across Manitoba. Using guiding principles of public participation processes, we hosted a policy roundtable meeting to engage stakeholders and use their input to refine the policy directions. Here, we report on the use and input of a policy roundtable meeting and its role in contributing to the development of evidence-informed policy.
机译:背景政策对话对于制定响应迅速,有效,可持续,有据可依的政策至关重要。我们的跨学科团队,包括研究人员,医师和高级决策者,对马尼托巴省温尼伯市的单次入境温尼伯中央入院服务进行了全面评估,以改善患者接受髋/膝关节置换手术的机会。我们使用评估结果制定了五个循证政策方针,以帮助改善整个曼尼托巴省计划内的临床服务的可及性。根据公众参与流程的指导原则,我们举办了一次政策圆桌会议,以吸引利益相关者参与并利用他们的意见来完善政策方向。在此,我们报告政策圆桌会议的使用和投入及其在制定循证政策方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号