首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis >Quality control on radiochemical purity in Technetium-99m radiopharmaceuticals labelling: three years of experience on 2280 procedures
【2h】

Quality control on radiochemical purity in Technetium-99m radiopharmaceuticals labelling: three years of experience on 2280 procedures

机译:Technetium-99m放射性药物标签中放射化学纯度的质量控制:2280程序的三年经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: the purpose of this study was to offer an example of evaluations of the ISO9001 certified internal quality assurance (QA) system of 99mTc-radiopharmaceutical preparations and quality control in vivo use, using industrial kits and generators in order to identify possible sources of errors in the procedures labeling and quality control procedures. Methods: The study was performed at a single institution over a period of three years (July 1st, 2011 - July 1st, 2014), and included a total of 2280 radiopharmaceutical preparations prepared by four different technologists. All the radiopharmaceutical preparations and quality controls were performed according to each SPC provided by the manufacturer. The radiopharmaceutical preparations were the following (trade names are reported in brackets): 99mTc-albumin colloid [Nanocoll] (n=349), 99mTc-oxidronate [Technescan®hdp] (n=701), 99mTc-exametazime [Ceretec] (n=169), 99mTc-sestamibi [Cardiolite] (n=92), 99mTc-albumin aggregated [Technescan®lyomaa] (n=140), 99mTc-tetrofosmin [Myoview]) (n=567), 99mTc-diethylene triamine pentacetic acid [Technescan®dtpa] (n=254), and 99mTc-dimercapto succinic acid [Renocis®] (n=8). Data were analyzed to determine the number and type of radiopharmaceutical labelling failure and to derive the sources of these failures to define corrective actions and optimize the quality assurance program. Results: A total of 2280 procedures were performed and recorded. Following the quality control procedure six out of the 2280 preparations (0.26%) were non-conforming for clinical use with the RCP limits indicated in the SPC. Five of these were due to gross technical errors in measurements and manual procedures and were immediately repeated, returning within the limits of acceptability. The sixth failure was due to short incubation time, though compliant with the manufacturer’s instructions. Conclusions: We concluded that the quality of the final product depends on a controlled production system based on the implementation of specific standard operating procedures (ISO9001, SOP) for each radiopharmaceutical production, according to strict adherence to the SPC of each radiopharmaceutical. Based on these conclusions, in our opinion every quality control suggesting a possible error in the synthesis procedure recommended in the SPC should be immediately reported to the manufacturer, for a revision of the SPC, as well as to the regulatory agencies for an alert. This strategy may in fact allow the continuous improvement of the labelling procedures and therefore the optimization of the quality control procedures frequency to ensure both patients safety and a more rational management of resources for economic sustainability. ()
机译:目的:本研究旨在提供使用工业套件和发生器对ISO9001认证的 99m Tc放射性药物制剂的内部质量保证(QA)系统和体内使用的质量控制进行评估的示例为了确定程序标签和质量控制程序中可能的错误来源。方法:该研究在单个机构中进行,为期三年(2011年7月1日至2014年7月1日),共2280人。由四位不同的技术人员制备的放射性药物制剂。根据制造商提供的每个SPC进行所有放射性药物制剂和质量控制。放射性药物制剂如下(商品名称记录在括号中): 99m Tc-白蛋白胶体[Nanocoll](n = 349), 99m Tc-氧化膦酸酯[Technescan® hdp](n = 701), 99m Tc-依米他命[Ceretec](n = 169), 99m Tc-sestamibi [Cardiolite](n = 92), 99m Tc-白蛋白聚集[Technescan®lyomaa](n = 140), 99m Tc-tetrofosmin [Myoview])(n = 567), 99m Tc-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸[Technescan®dtpa](n = 254)和 99m Tc-二巯基琥珀酸[Renocis®](n = 8)。分析数据以确定放射性药物标记失败的数量和类型,并得出这些失败的根源,以定义纠正措施并优化质量保证程序。结果:总共进行了2280例程序并进行了记录。按照质量控制程序,2280份制剂中有6份(0.26%)不符合SPC指示的RCP限值,无法用于临床。其中五个是由于测量和手动程序中的重大技术错误而导致的,并立即重复进行,并在可接受的范围内返回。第六个失败是由于孵化时间短,尽管符合制造商的说明。结论:我们得出的结论是,根据严格遵守每种放射性药物SPC的要求,最终产品的质量取决于受控的生产系统,该系统基于对每种放射性药物产品执行特定标准操作程序(ISO9001,SOP)的情况。基于这些结论,我们认为,建议在SPC中建议的合成程序中可能存在错误的每个质量控制措施,均应立即报告给制造商,以对SPC进行修订,并向监管机构报告。实际上,这种策略可以允许标签程序的不断改进,从而可以优化质量控制程序的频率,以确保患者安全并实现经济可持续性的更合理的资源管理。 ()

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号