首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Indian Journal of Surgery >A Comparative Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Fine Needle Non-aspiration Cytology (FNNAC) Technique in Lesions of Thyroid Gland
【2h】

A Comparative Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Fine Needle Non-aspiration Cytology (FNNAC) Technique in Lesions of Thyroid Gland

机译:甲状腺病变的细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)和细针非抽吸细胞学(FNNAC)技术的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study was done to compare diagnostic yield by fine needle non aspiration technique (FNNAC) with Fine Needle Aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lesions in thyroid gland. FNNAC and FNAC both were performed on 69 patients presenting with thyroid lesions, except those suffering from thyrotoxicosis. Smears were then cytologically interpreted by a single pathologist as unsuitable, diagnostically adequate or diagnostically superior for opinion, without the knowledge of sampling method employed. Slides were evaluated for following aspects namely cellularity, presence of colloid, inflammatory cell, hemosiderin laden macrophages, papillary clusters nuclear overlapping, nuclear grooving, hurthle cells. FNNAC gave better results in form of better quality of cellularity and less field obscurity by blood in lesions of thyroid. Diagnostically superior specimens were obtained more frequently by FNNAC, so this technique should be used alone or in tandem with FNAC for better diagnostic yield.
机译:本研究旨在比较细针非抽吸技术(FNNAC)和甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)对病变的诊断率。 FNNAC和FNAC均对69例有甲状腺病变的患者进行了检查,但甲状腺毒症患者除外。然后,在不了解所采用的采样方法的情况下,由单个病理学家将涂片在细胞学上解释为不合适,诊断上适当或诊断上对意见有利。评估玻片的以下方面,即细胞性,胶体的存在,炎性细胞,含铁血黄素的巨噬细胞,乳头状簇核重叠,核切槽,内皮细胞。 FNNAC表现出更好的结果,其形式为更好的细胞质量和更少的甲状腺病变中血液引起的视野模糊。通过FNNAC可以更频繁地获得诊断上优异的标本,因此该技术应单独使用或与FNAC结合使用,以提高诊断率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号