首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Cardiac output measurement using a modified carbon dioxide Fick method: comparison analysis with pulmonary artery catheter method and pulse induced contour cardiac output method
【2h】

Cardiac output measurement using a modified carbon dioxide Fick method: comparison analysis with pulmonary artery catheter method and pulse induced contour cardiac output method

机译:使用改良二氧化碳Fick方法进行心输出量测量:与肺动脉导管方法和脉搏诱导轮廓心输出量方法进行比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: In the present study, cardiac output in mechanically ventilated patients were determined using three methods including modified CO2-Fick (mCO2F), pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), and pulse induced contour cardiac output (PiCCO) methods and the results were compared to assess the effectiveness of mCO2F method in measuring the cardiac output. Method: Mechanically ventilated and hemodynamically unstable patients (n=39) were sedated and intubated with Swan-Ganz or PiCCO arterial catheters. At the beginning of the experiment and at 4 h after the experiment, the CO2 concentration in expiratory air was measured through a CO2 monitor and it was used further in the cardiac output calculation using mCO2F method. The cardiac output was also determined using PAC and PiCCO methods. Results: The cardiac output determined by PAC and mCO2F method was not significantly (P>0.05) different [5.53±2.85 L.min-1 (PAC) and 5.96±2.92 L.min-1 (mCO2F)] at the beginning of the experiment and [6.22±2.7 L.min-1 (PAC) and 6.36±2.35 L.min-1 (mCO2F)] at 4 h after the experiment; however, they were highly correlated (r=0.939 and 0.908, P<0.001). The cardiac output determined by PiCCO and mCO2F method was also not significantly (P>0.05) different [6.05±2.49 L.min-1 (PiCCO) and 5.44±1.64 L.min-1 (mCO2F)] at the beginning of the experiment, and [6.17±2.04 L.min-1 (PiCCO) and 5.70±1.72 L.min-1 (mCO2F)] at 4 h after the experiment; however, they were highly correlated (r=0.776 and 0.832, P<0.001). Conclusion: The mCO2F method could accurately measure the cardiac output in mechanically ventilated patients without using any expensive equipment’s and invasive procedures.
机译:目的:在本研究中,采用改良的CO2-Fick(mCO2F),肺动脉导管(PAC)和脉搏诱导轮廓心输出量(PiCCO)方法三种方法测定了机械通气患者的心输出量,并将结果与评估mCO2F方法在测量心输出量方面的有效性。方法:对机械通气和血液动力学不稳定的患者(n = 39)进行镇静,并用Swan-Ganz或PiCCO动脉导管进行插管。在实验开始时和实验后4小时,通过CO2监测器测量呼气中的CO2浓度,并将其进一步用于通过mCO2F方法计算心输出量。还使用PAC和PiCCO方法确定了心输出量。结果:通过PAC和mCO2F法测定的心输出量无明显差异(P> 0.05)[5.53±2.85 L.min -1 (PAC)和5.96±2.92 L.min -实验开始时为1 (mCO2F),[PAC]和[6.22±2.7 L.min -1 (PAC)和6.36±2.35 L.min -1 (mCO2F)]在实验后4小时;然而,它们高度相关(r = 0.939和0.908,P <0.001)。 PiCCO和mCO2F方法测得的心输出量也无明显差异(P> 0.05)[6.05±2.49 L.min -1 (PiCCO)和5.44±1.64 L.min -1 (mCO2F)],以及[6.17±2.04 L.min -1 (PiCCO)和5.70±1.72 L.min -1 (mCO2F)]在实验后4小时;然而,它们是高度相关的(r = 0.776和0.832,P <0.001)。结论:mCO2F方法可以准确测量机械通气患者的心输出量,而无需使用任何昂贵的设备和侵入性程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号