首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Value of segmental coronary calcium score on diagnosis and interventional treatment of coronary lesions by 320-slice DVCT
【2h】

Value of segmental coronary calcium score on diagnosis and interventional treatment of coronary lesions by 320-slice DVCT

机译:冠状动脉钙化节段评分在320层DVCT对冠状动脉病变的诊断和介入治疗中的价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The global coronary calcium score has been widely used in the evaluation of coronary plaque burden and cardiovascular disease events. In this study, we investigated the value of segmental coronary calcium score (SCCS) on the diagnosis and interventional treatment. We studied 87 patients with coronary angiography (CAG) and coronary CT angiography (CTA) by 320-slice dynamic volume CT (DVCT). SCCS was determined for each segmental separately. All lesions which SCCS was greater than 0 were enrolled, and were divided into three groups, mild calcification group (SCCS were less than 80), Moderate calcification group (SCCS were more than 80 and less than 200) and Severe calcification group (SCCS were more than 200). From above three groups, lesions received the intervention treatment were elected as subgroup. The position of lesions, plaque morphology, calcification proportion and interventional treatment data were analyzed. Severe calcification group were more frequent in the proximal lesions, stenosis with lesser extent, nubbly and nodular types of plaque, and the inconsistency with CAG was higher than the other two groups (P < 0.05). In the subgroup, more pre-dilatation and post-dilatation balloon were used in severe calcification group, with higher expansion pressure of balloon and stent (P < 0.05), but the diameter of stents was no difference between the three groups. Conclusion: SCCS is better than GCCS in the evaluation of coronary calcification, and play an important role in the judgment of stenosis by coronary CT and in the choice of interventional therapeutic devices.
机译:全球冠状动脉钙化评分已广泛用于评估冠状动脉斑块负担和心血管疾病事件。在这项研究中,我们调查了节段性冠状动脉钙化评分(SCCS)在诊断和介入治疗中的价值。我们通过320层动态容积CT(DVCT)研究了87例冠状动脉造影(CAG)和冠状动脉CT血管造影(CTA)患者。为每个细分分别确定了SCCS。选择SCCS大于0的所有病变,分为轻度钙化组(SCCS小于80),中度钙化组(SCCS大于80且小于200)和重度钙化组(SCCS分别为三组)。超过200)。从以上三组中,将接受干预治疗的病变选为亚组。分析病灶的位置,斑块形态,钙化比例和介入治疗数据。重度钙化组近端病变多见,狭窄程度较轻,斑块呈结节状和结节型,与CAG不一致的发生率高于其他两组(P <0.05)。在亚组中,严重钙化组使用更多的扩张前和扩张后球囊,球囊和支架的扩张压力更高(P <0.05),但三组之间的支架直径无差异。结论:SCCS在评估冠状动脉钙化方面优于GCCS,在冠状动脉CT对狭窄的判断和介入治疗设备的选择中起着重要的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号