首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Data in Brief >Comparative assessment of data obtained using empirical models for path loss predictions in a university campus environment
【2h】

Comparative assessment of data obtained using empirical models for path loss predictions in a university campus environment

机译:在大学校园环境中使用经验模型进行路径损耗预测的数据的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Empirical models are most widely used for path loss predictions because they are simple, easy to use, and require less computational efficiency when compared to deterministic models. A number of empirical path loss models have been developed for efficient radio network planning and optimization in different types of propagation environments. However, data that prove the suitability of these models for path loss predictions in a typical university campus propagation environment are yet to be reported in the literature. In this data article, empirical prediction models are comparatively assessed using the path loss data measured and predicted for a university campus environment. Field measurement campaigns are conducted at 1800 MHz radio frequency to log the actual path losses along three major routes within the campus of Covenant University, Nigeria. Path loss values are computed along the three measurement routes based on four popular empirical path loss models (Okumura-Hata, COST 231, ECC-33, and Egli). Datasets containing measured and predicted path loss values are presented in a spreadsheet file, which is attached to this data article as supplementary material. Path loss prediction data of the empirical models are compared to those of the measured path loss using first-order statistics, boxplot representations, tables, and graphs. In addition, correlation analysis, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparison post-hoc tests are performed. The prediction accuracies of the empirical models are evaluated based on Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Standard Error Deviation (SED). In conclusion, the high-resolution path loss prediction datasets and the rich data exploration provided in this data article will help radio network engineers and academic researchers to determine the empirical model that is most suitable for path loss prediction in a typical university campus environment.
机译:经验模型最广泛地用于路径损耗预测,因为与确定性模型相比,经验模型简单,易用且计算效率较低。为了在不同类型的传播环境中进行有效的无线网络规划和优化,已经开发了许多经验路径损耗模型。然而,尚未有文献报道证明这些模型适用于典型的大学校园传播环境中的路径损耗预测的数据。在此数据文章中,使用针对大学校园环境测量和预测的路径损耗数据对评估模型进行了比较评估。实地测量活动是在1800 MHz射频上进行的,以记录尼日利亚Covenant大学校园内三条主要路线上的实际路径损耗。基于四个流行的经验路径损耗模型(Okumura-Hata,COST 231,ECC-33和Egli),沿着三个测量路径计算路径损耗值。包含测量的路径损耗值和预测的路径损耗值的数据集以电子表格文件的形式提供,该电子表格文件作为补充材料附加到此数据文章中。使用一阶统计量,箱形图表示,表格和图形,将经验模型的路径损耗预测数据与测得的路径损耗进行比较。此外,还进行了相关分析,方差分析(ANOVA)和多重比较事后检验。基于平均绝对误差(MAE),均方根误差(RMSE)和标准误差偏差(SED)评估经验模型的预测准确性。总之,本文提供的高分辨率路径损耗预测数据集和丰富的数据探索将帮助无线电网络工程师和学术研究人员确定最适合典型大学校园环境中路径损耗预测的经验模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号