首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Medical Association Journal >A Comparison of the Effects of Chlorothiazide Quinethazone and Placebo on Student Volunteers and on Rats
【2h】

A Comparison of the Effects of Chlorothiazide Quinethazone and Placebo on Student Volunteers and on Rats

机译:氯噻嗪喹硫酮和安慰剂对学生志愿者和大鼠的作用比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Medical student participation in a controlled doubleblind clinical bioassay provides an effective introduction to clinical pharmacology and perhaps the best stimulus to the future rational evaluation and use of drugs. In one such exercise, 27 volunteers were divided into three groups: one received 50 mg. quinethazone, one 500 mg. chlorothiazide and the third a lactose placebo. Urine was collected for three 90-minute periods, volume and pH being recorded; sodium and potassium were measured with a flame photometer, and chloride by the Volhard technique. Although this study was primarily a comparative bioassay of two established diuretics against a placebo, no previous direct comparisons of these diuretics could be found in the literature. The diuretic activity of chlorothiazide and quinethazone compared to placebo therapy was confirmed in both humans and rats, the use of controls was illustrated, and a higher mean sodium-potassium ratio for quinethazone than for chlorothiazide was demonstrated.
机译:医学生参与受控的双盲临床生物测定可以为临床药理学提供有效的介绍,并且可能是对未来合理评估和使用药物的最佳刺激。在一项这样的锻炼中,将27名志愿者分为三组:一组接受50毫克剂量。 quinethazone,一500毫克。氯噻嗪,第三个是乳糖安慰剂。在三个90分钟的时间内收集尿液,记录其体积和pH值;用火焰光度计测量钠和钾,用Volhard技术测量氯。尽管这项研究主要是针对两种已建立的利尿剂与安慰剂的比较生物测定法,但在文献中未发现这些利尿剂的直接比较。与安慰剂相比,氯噻嗪和喹硫ide的利尿活性在人和大鼠中均得到了证实,并说明了对照的使用,并且喹硫zone的平均钠钾比氯噻嗪的平均钠钾比更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号