首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study
【2h】

Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study

机译:基于定义和实际出生登记对围产期和婴儿死亡率国际比较的影响:基于人群的回顾性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives To examine variations in the registration of extremely low birthweight and early gestation births and to assess their effect on perinatal and infant mortality rankings of industrialised countries.>Design Retrospective population based study.>Setting Australia, Canada, European countries, and the United States for 2004; Australia, Canada, and New Zealand for 2007.>Population National data on live births and on fetal, neonatal, and infant deaths.>Main outcome measures Reported proportions of live births with birth weight/gestational age of less than 500 g, less than 1000 g, less than 24 weeks, and less than 28 weeks; crude rates of fetal, neonatal, and infant mortality; mortality rates calculated after exclusion of births under 500 g, under 1000 g, less than 24 weeks, and less than 28 weeks.>Results The proportion of live births under 500 g varied widely from less than 1 per 10 000 live births in Belgium and Ireland to 10.8 per 10 000 live births in Canada and 16.9 in the United States. Neonatal deaths under 500 g, as a proportion of all neonatal deaths, also ranged from less than 1% in countries such as Luxembourg and Malta to 29.6% in Canada and 31.1% in the United States. Rankings of countries based on crude fetal, neonatal, and infant mortality rates differed substantially from rankings based on rates calculated after exclusion of births with a birth weight of less than 1000 g or a gestational age of less than 28 weeks.>Conclusions International differences in reported rates of extremely low birthweight and very early gestation births probably reflect variations in registration of births and compromise the validity of international rankings of perinatal and infant mortality.
机译:>目标:研究极低出生体重和早孕出生登记的变化,并评估其对工业化国家围产期和婴儿死亡率排名的影响。>设计回顾性人群研究。 >设置 2004年的澳大利亚,加拿大,欧洲国家和美国; 2007年在澳大利亚,加拿大和新西兰进行的调查。>人口有关活产婴儿以及胎儿,新生儿和婴儿死亡的国家数据。>主要结果指标报告的活产婴儿占出生婴儿的比例体重/胎龄小于500 g,小于1000 g,小于24周和小于28周;粗略的胎儿,新生儿和婴儿死亡率;排除500 g以下,1000 g以下,小于24周和小于28周的婴儿后的死亡率。>结果 500 g以下的活产婴儿的比例差异很大,每10例中小于1比利时和爱尔兰有000例活产,加拿大每10 000例活产中有10.8例,美国为16.9例。 500克以下的新生儿死亡在所有新生儿死亡中所占的比例也从卢森堡和马耳他等国家的不足1%到加拿大的29.6%和美国的31.1%不等。基于粗略的胎儿,新生儿和婴儿死亡率的国家排名与基于排除出生体重小于1000 g或胎龄小于28周的婴儿后计算的比率的排名大不相同。>结论< / strong>报告的极低出生体重和极早妊娠出生率的国际差异可能反映了出生登记的变化,并损害了围产期和婴儿死亡率的国际排名的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号