首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Bronchodilator treatment in moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis: continuous or on demand? A randomised controlled study.
【2h】

Bronchodilator treatment in moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis: continuous or on demand? A randomised controlled study.

机译:中度哮喘或慢性支气管炎的支气管扩张剂治疗:连续或按需?一项随机对照研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To examine the effect of bronchodilator treatment given continuously versus on demand on the progression of asthma and chronic bronchitis and to compare the long term effects of a beta 2 adrenergic drug (salbutamol) and an anticholinergic drug (ipratropium bromide). DESIGN--Two year randomised controlled prospective 'crossover' study in which patients were assigned to one of two parallel treatment groups receiving continuous treatment or treatment on demand. SETTING--29 general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen. PATIENTS--223 patients aged greater than or equal to 30 with moderate airway obstruction due to asthma or chronic bronchitis, selected by their general practitioners. INTERVENTIONS--1600 micrograms salbutamol or 160 micrograms ipratropium bromide daily (113 patients) or salbutamol or ipratropium bromide only during exacerbations or periods of dyspnoea (110). No other pulmonary treatment was permitted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Decline in ventilatory function and change in bronchial responsiveness, respiratory symptoms, number of exacerbations, and quality of life. RESULTS--Among 144 patients completing the study, after correction for possible confounding factors the decline in forced expiratory volume in one second was -0.072 l/year in continuously treated patients and -0.020 l/year in those treated on demand (p less than 0.05), irrespective of the drug. The difference in the decline in patients with asthma was comparable with that in patients with chronic bronchitis (asthma: 0.092 v -0.025 l/year; chronic bronchitis: -0.082 v -0.031 l/year). Bronchial responsiveness increased slightly (0.4 doubling dose) with continuous treatment in chronic bronchitis, but exacerbations, symptoms, and quality of life were unchanged. Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide had comparable effects on all variables investigated. CONCLUSIONS--Continuous bronchodilator treatment without anti-inflammatory treatment accelerates decline in ventilatory function. Bronchodilators should be used only on demand, with additional corticosteroid treatment, if necessary.
机译:目的-研究连续给予和按需给予支气管扩张剂治疗对哮喘和慢性支气管炎进展的作用,并比较β2肾上腺素能药物(沙丁胺醇)和抗胆碱能药物(异丙托溴铵)的长期作用。设计-一项为期两年的随机对照前瞻性“交叉”研究,其中将患者分配到接受连续治疗或按需治疗的两个平行治疗组之一。地点-奈梅亨大学集水区的29条常规做法。患者-由全科医生选择的223岁以上,≥30岁的患者因哮喘或慢性支气管炎而出现中度气道阻塞。干预措施-每天1600微克沙丁胺醇或160微克异丙托溴铵(113例)或沙丁胺醇或异丙托溴铵仅在病情加重或呼吸困难期间出现(110)。禁止其他肺部治疗。主要观察指标-通气功能下降,支气管反应性,呼吸道症状,病情加重和生活质量下降。结果-在完成研究的144位患者中,在校正可能的混杂因素后,持续治疗患者在一秒内的强制呼气量下降为-0.072 l /年,按需治疗患者为-0.020 l /年(p小于0.05),与药物无关。哮喘患者下降的差异与慢性支气管炎患者的下降差异相当(哮喘:0.092 v -0.025 l /年;慢性支气管炎:-0.082 v -0.031 l /年)。持续治疗慢性支气管炎时,支气管反应性略有增加(0.4倍剂量),但病情加重,症状和生活质量未改变。沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵对所有研究的变量具有可比的影响。结论-持续进行支气管扩张药治疗而未进行抗炎治疗会加速呼吸功能下降。支气管扩张剂应仅在有需要时使用,必要时可进行额外的糖皮质激素治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号