首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
【2h】

Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

机译:基于初级保健的体育锻炼促进的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives To determine whether trials of physical activity promotion based in primary care show sustained effects on physical activity or fitness in sedentary adults, and whether exercise referral interventions are more effective than other interventions.>Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.>Data sources Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists.>Review methods Review of randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in sedentary adults recruited in primary care, with minimum follow-up of 12 months, reporting physical activity or fitness (or both) as outcomes, and using intention to treat analyses. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, appraised risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model.>Results We included 15 trials (n=8745). Most interventions took place in primary care, included health professionals in delivery, and involved advice or counselling given face to face or by phone (or both) on multiple occasions. Only three trials investigated exercise referral. In 13 trials presenting self reported physical activity, we saw small to medium positive intervention effects at 12 months (odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.73; standardised mean difference 0.25, 0.11 to 0.38). The number needed to treat with an intervention for one additional sedentary adult to meet internationally recommended levels of activity at 12 months was 12 (7 to 33). In four trials reporting cardiorespiratory fitness, a medium positive effect at 12 months was non-significant (standardised mean difference 0.51, −0.18 to 1.20). Three trials of exercise referral found small non-significant effects on self reported physical activity at 12 months (odds ratio 1.38; 0.98 to 1.95; standardised mean difference 0.20, −0.21 to 0.61).>Conclusions Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report. We found insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions. Primary care commissioners should consider these findings while awaiting further trial evaluation of exercise referral schemes and other primary care interventions, with longer follow-up and use of objective measures of outcome.
机译:>目标:确定基于初级保健的体育锻炼促进试验是否对久坐的成年人的体育锻炼或健康状况产生持续影响,以及运动转诊干预措施是否比其他干预措施更有效。>设计随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。>数据来源 Medline,CINAHL,PsycINFO,EMBASE,SPORTDiscus,评价和传播中心,Cochrane库和文章参考列表。>审查方法审查在初级保健中招募的久坐久坐的成年人进行体育锻炼的随机对照试验,至少随访12个月,报告体育锻炼或健康状况(或两者)作为结果,并使用治疗意图进行分析。两名评价者独立评估了研究的纳入,偏倚风险评估和提取数据。使用随机效应模型计算合并效应的大小。>结果我们纳入了15个试验(n = 8745)。大多数干预措施是在初级保健中进行的,包括分娩时的卫生专业人员,并多次涉及面对面或通过电话(或二者兼有)提供的建议或咨询。只有三项试验调查了运动推荐。在13项自我报告身体活动的试验中,我们在12个月时看到了中小型的积极干预效果(赔率1.42,95%置信区间1.17至1.73;标准均差0.25,0.11至0.38)。在另外一个久坐的成年人进行干预以达到12个月的国际推荐活动水平时,需要进行干预的人数为12(7至33)。在四项报告心肺健康的试验中,在12个月时的中度阳性反应不显着(标准化平均差异为0.51,-0.18至1.20)。进行体育锻炼的三项试验发现,在12个月时对自我报告的体育锻炼的影响不明显(赔率1.38; 0.98至1.95;标准平均差0.20,-0.21至0.61)。>结论根据自我报告,在初级保健中招募的久坐久坐成年人的活动显着增加了其在12个月时的身体活动水平。我们发现没有足够的证据推荐运动咨询方案,而不是建议或咨询干预措施。初级保健专员应考虑这些发现,同时等待对运动转诊计划和其他初级保健干预措施的进一步试验评估,并应采取更长的随访措施并使用客观的结局指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号