首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Arthritis Research >Comparative effectiveness of treatment with the first TNF antagonist in monotherapy the first TNF antagonist plus one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and the first TNF antagonist plus two or more conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
【2h】

Comparative effectiveness of treatment with the first TNF antagonist in monotherapy the first TNF antagonist plus one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and the first TNF antagonist plus two or more conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

机译:在类风湿性关节炎患者中第一种TNF拮抗剂在单一疗法第一种TNF拮抗剂加一种常规的合成疾病缓解性抗风湿药和第一种TNF拮抗剂加两种或多种常规合成的疾病缓解性风湿性药物治疗中的比较疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are treated with a mean of 3–4 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with or without glucocorticoids (GCs), before the first biologic prescription. The main reasons for change are inefficacy in 30–40 % of patients, and toxicity ≈ 10 %. Thus, they are treated with the first TNF antagonists in monotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyse the csDMARD and GC prescription patterns before and during treatment with the first TNF antagonist, and compare their effectiveness in three groups of patients.
机译:背景在第一个生物处方之前,类风湿关节炎(RA)患者平均应使用3-4种具有或不具有糖皮质激素(GC)的常规合成疾病缓解型抗风湿药(csDMARDs)进行治疗。改变的主要原因是30-40%的患者无效,毒性≈10%。因此,它们在单一疗法中用首批TNF拮抗剂治疗。这项研究的目的是分析使用第一种TNF拮抗剂治疗前后的csDMARD和GC处方模式,并比较它们在三组患者中的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号