首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
【2h】

Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda

机译:评估系统的教师发展:双重议程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Faculty development for the evaluation process serves two distinct goals. The first goal is to improve the quality of the evaluations submitted by the faculty. Providing an accurate assessment of a learner’s capabilities is a skill and, similar to other skills, can be developed with training. Frame-of-reference training serves to calibrate the faculty’s standard of performance and build a uniform language of the evaluation. Second, areas for faculty professional growth can be identified from data generated from learners’ evaluations of the faculty using narrative comments, item-level comparison reports, and comparative rank list information. This paper presents an innovative model, grounded in institutional experience and review of the literature, to provide feedback to faculty evaluators, thereby improving the reliability of the evaluation process, and motivating the professional growth of faculty as educators.
机译:评估过程中的教师发展有两个不同的目标。第一个目标是提高教师提交的评估的质量。提供对学习者能力的准确评估是一项技能,并且与其他技能类似,可以通过培训来发展。参考框架培训旨在校准教师的绩效标准,并建立统一的评估语言。其次,可以使用叙述性注释,项目级别的比较报告和比较等级列表信息,根据学习者对教师的评估所产生的数据来确定教师专业发展的领域。本文提出了一种基于机构经验和文献综述的创新模型,以向教师评估者提供反馈,从而提高评估过程的可靠性,并激励教师作为教育工作者的专业发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号