首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AAPS PharmSci >Flow Imaging Microscopy for Protein Particle Analysis—A Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Analytical Instruments
【2h】

Flow Imaging Microscopy for Protein Particle Analysis—A Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Analytical Instruments

机译:用于蛋白质颗粒分析的流动成像显微镜—四种不同分析仪器的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Flow imaging microscopy was introduced as a technique for protein particle analysis a few years ago and has strongly gained in importance ever since. The aim of the present study was a comparative evaluation of four of the most relevant flow imaging microscopy systems for biopharmaceuticals on the market: Micro-Flow Imaging (MFI)4100, MFI5200, Flow Cytometer And Microscope (FlowCAM) VS1, and FlowCAM PV. Polystyrene standards, particles generated from therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, and silicone oil droplets were analyzed by all systems. The performance was critically assessed regarding quantification, characterization, image quality, differentiation of protein particles and silicone oil droplets, and handling of the systems. The FlowCAM systems, especially the FlowCAM VS1, showed high-resolution images. The FlowCAM PV system provided the most precise quantification of particles of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, also under impaired optical conditions by an increased refractive index of the formulation. Furthermore, the most accurate differentiation of protein particles and silicone oil droplets could be achieved with this instrument. The MFI systems provided excellent size and count accuracy (evaluated with polystyrene standards) especially the MFI5200 system. This instrument also showed very good performance for protein particles, also in case of an increased refractive index of the formulation. Both MFI systems were easier to use and appeared more standardized regarding measurement and data analysis as compared to the FlowCAM systems. Our study shows that the selection of the appropriate flow imaging microscopy system depends strongly on the main output parameters of interest and it is recommended to decide based on the intended application.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-013-9522-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:流动成像显微镜是几年前作为蛋白质颗粒分析技术而引入的,此后就变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是对市场上四种最相关的生物制药流成像显微镜系统进行比较评估:微流成像(MFI)4100,MFI5200,流式细胞仪和显微镜(FlowCAM)VS1和FlowCAM PV。所有系统均分析了聚苯乙烯标准品,由治疗性单克隆抗体产生的颗粒以及硅油滴。在定量,表征,图像质量,蛋白质颗粒和硅油滴的区分以及系统处理方面,对性能进行了严格的评估。 FlowCAM系统,尤其是FlowCAM VS1,显示高分辨率图像。 FlowCAM PV系统还可以在光学条件受损的情况下,通过提高制剂的折射率,对治疗性单克隆抗体的颗粒进行最精确的定量。此外,使用该仪器可以最准确地区分蛋白质颗粒和硅油滴。 MFI系统提供了出色的尺寸和计数精度(以聚苯乙烯标准评估),特别是MFI5200系统。即使在制剂的折射率增加的情况下,该仪器对于蛋白质颗粒也表现出非常好的性能。与FlowCAM系统相比,这两种MFI系统都更易于使用,并且在测量和数据分析方面显得更加标准化。我们的研究表明,适当的流式成像显微镜系统的选择在很大程度上取决于感兴趣的主要输出参数,建议根据预期的应用进行决定。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1208 / s12248-013 -9522-2)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号