Comparing outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection between Eastern and Western countries:A systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要

AIM To compare endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) outcomes between Eastern and Western countries.METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pub Med,MEDLINE,Web of Science,CINAHL and EBM reviews to identify studies published between 1990 and February 2016. The primary outcome was the efficacy of ESD based on information about either curative resection,en bloc or R0 resection rates. Secondary outcomes were complication rates,local recurrence rates and procedure times. RESULTS Overall,238 publications including 84318 patients and 89512 gastrointestinal lesions resected using ESD were identified. 90% of the identified studies reporting ESDon 87296 lesions were conducted in Eastern countries and 10% of the identified studies reporting ESD outcomes in 2216 lesions were from Western countries. Meta-analyses showed higher pooled percentage of curative,en bloc,and R0 resection in the Eastern studies; 82%(CI: 81%-84%),95%(CI: 94%-96%) and 89%(CI: 88%-91%) compared to Western studies; 71%(CI: 61%-81%),85%(CI: 81%-89%) and 74%(CI: 67%-81%) respectively. The percentage of perforation requiring surgery was significantly greater in the Western countries(0.53%; CI: 0.10-1.16) compared to Eastern countries(0.01%; CI: 0%-0.05%). ESD procedure times were longer in Western countries(110 min vs 77 min).CONCLUSION Eastern countries show better ESD outcomes compared to Western countries. Availability of local ESD expertise and regional outcomes should be considered for decision making to treat gastrointestinal lesions with ESD.