首页> 外文期刊>世界急诊医学杂志(英文版) >Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients:a meta-analysis
【24h】

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients:a meta-analysis

机译:心脏骤停患者主动压缩-减压心肺复苏(CPR)与标准CPR的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation(ACDCPR) has been popular in the treatment of patients with cardiac arrest(CA).However,the effect of ACD-CPR versus conventional standard CPR(S-CRP) is contriversial.This study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of ACD-CPR versus S-CRP in treating CA patients.METHODS:Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials published from January 1990 to March 2011 were searched with the phrase 'active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiac arrest' in PubMed,EmBASE,and China Biomedical Document Databases.The Cochrane Library was searched for papers of meta-analysis.Restoration of spontaneous circulation(ROSC) rate,survival rate to hospital admission,survival rate at 24 hours,and survival rate to hospital discharge were considered primary outcomes,and complications after CPR were viewed as secondary outcomes.Included studies were critically appraised and estimates of effects were calculated according to the model of fixed or random effects.Inconsistency across the studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic method.Sensitivity analysis was made to determine statistical heterogeneity.RESULTS:Thirteen studies met the criteria for this meta-analysis.The studies included 396 adult CA patients treated by ACD-CPR and 391 patients by S-CRP.Totally 234 CA patients were found out hospitals,while the other 333 CA patients were in hospitals.Two studies were evaluated with high-quality methodology and the rest 11 studies were of poor quality.ROSC rate,survival rate at 24 hours and survival rate to hospital discharge with favorable neurological function indicated that ACD-CPR is superior to S-CRP,with relative risk(RR) values of 1.39(95%CI 0.99-1.97),1.94(95%CI 1.45-2.59) and 2.80(95%CI 1.60-5.24).No significant differences were found in survival rate to hospital admission and survival rate to hospital discharge for ACD-CPR versus S-CRP with RR values of 1.06(95%CI 0.76-1.60) and 1.00(95%CI 0.73-1.38).CONCLUSION:Quality controlled studies confirmed the superiority of ACD-CPR to S-CRP in terms of ROSC rate and survival rate at 24 hours.Compared with S-CRP,ACD-CPR could not improve survival rate to hospital admission or survival rate to hospital discharge.
机译:背景:主动压缩减压心肺复苏术(ACDCPR)在心搏骤停(CA)患者的治疗中很普遍,但是ACD-CPR与常规标准CPR(S-CRP)的疗效存在争议。方法:分析1990年1月至2011年3月发表的随机或半随机对照试验,其短语为“主动压缩-减压心肺复苏和心脏骤停”。在PubMed,EmBASE和中国生物医学文献数据库中检索Cochrane图书馆的荟萃分析论文。恢复自然循环(ROSC)率,入院生存率,24小时生存率以及出院生存率。被认为是主要结局,将心肺复苏后的并发症视为次要结局。对包括的研究进行了严格评估,并计算了疗效评估根据固定或随机效应模型,使用I2统计方法评估研究之间的不一致性,进行敏感性分析以确定统计异质性。结果:十三项研究符合该荟萃分析的标准,研究包括396名成年CA接受ACD-CPR治疗的患者和391例接受S-CRP治疗的患者ROSC率,24小时生存率和出院后生存率均具有良好的神经功能,这表明ACD-CPR优于S-CRP,相对风险(RR)值为1.39(95%CI 0.99-1.97), 1.94(95%CI 1.45-2.59)和2.80(95%CI 1.60-5.24).ACD-CPR与S-CRP的入院生存率和出院生存率无显着差异,RR值为1.06 (95%CI 0.76-1.60)和1.00 (95%CI 0.73-1.38)。结论:质量控制研究证实了ACD-CPR在24小时的ROSC率和生存率方面优于S-CRP。与S-CRP相比,ACD-CPR不能提高生存率住院率或出院生存率。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号