首页> 外文期刊>世界急诊医学杂志(英文版) >Effect of a triage course on quality of rating triage codes in a group of university nursing students:a before-after observational study
【24h】

Effect of a triage course on quality of rating triage codes in a group of university nursing students:a before-after observational study

机译:分诊课程对一组护理大学生分级分诊代码质量的影响:一项前后观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Most current triage tools have been tested among hospital nurses groups but there are not similar studies in university setting.In this study we analyzed if a course on a new fourlevel triage model,triage emergency method(TEM),could improve the quality of rating in a group of nursing students.METHODS:This observational study was conducted with paper scenarios at the University of Parma,Italy.Fifty students were assigned a triage level to 105 paper scenarios before and after a course on triage and TEM.We used weighted kappa statistics to measure the inter-rater reliability of TEM and assessed its validity by comparing the students’ predictions with the triage code rating of a reference standard(a panel of five experts in the new triage method).RESULTS:Inter-rater reliability was K=0.42(95%Cl:0.37-0.46) before the course on TEM,and K=0.61(95%CI:0.56-0.67) after.The accuracy of students’ triage rating for the reference standard triage code was good:81%(95%Cl:71-90).After the TEM course,the proportion of cases assigned to each acuity triage level was similar for the student group and the panel of experts.CONCLUSION:Among the group of nursing students,a brief course on triage and on a new inhospital triage method seems to improve the quality of rating codes.The new triage method shows good inter-rater reliability for rating triage acuity and good accuracy in predicting the triage code rating of the reference standard.
机译:背景:目前大多数分诊工具已在医院护士组中进行了测试,但在大学环境中尚未进行类似的研究。在这项研究中,我们分析了一种新的四级分诊模型,分诊急诊方法(TEM)的课程是否可以提高医院分诊质量方法:这项观察性研究是在意大利帕尔马大学的纸质情景下进行的。在分类和TEM课程之前和之后,对50名学生进行了105种纸质情景的分类分类。 kappa统计量表用于测量TEM的评定者间信度,并通过将学生的预测与参考标准的分诊代码等级(由新的分诊方法组成的五位专家组成的小组)进行比较来评估其有效性。在TEM上课程前K = 0.42(95%Cl:0.37-0.46),在课程结束后K = 0.61(95%CI:0.56-0.67)。参考标准分类代码对学生分类的准确度是良好:81 %(95%Cl:71-90).TE之后在M课程中,学生组和专家小组分配给每个敏锐度分类级别的病例比例是相似的。结论:在护理学生组中,关于分类和新的院内分类方法的简短课程似乎可以改善新的分诊方法显示了评估者之间对分诊敏锐度的可靠性,并且在预测参考标准的分诊码评分方面具有良好的准确性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号