散打与跆拳道比较研究

摘要

By exploiting comparative teaching principle and adopting the method of analogy, this paper conducted a comparative study from three aspects of Chinese Sanda and Korean taekwondo, namely development and promotion, technical characteristics and rules of the game. This study shows that: whether it is from the time of the reformation, ways of promotion, transmission, numbers of practitioners, or international competition, taekwondo is more higher than that of the modern Sanda; the offensive and defensive characteristics of modern Sanda tend to be counterattack after defense, which is less ornamental than Taekwondo; and that Taekwondo has a uniform rules and criteria, in contrast Sanda’s rules are relatively random. Suggestions: China should examine Sanda from the cultural perspective and accelerate the pace of promotion and to promote lifelong education mode of Sanda.%文章运用对比教学原理，通过类比的方法，对中国的武术散打与韩国的跆拳道做三项比较研究，即发展现状与推广、技术风格特征和比赛规则。比较结果表明：跆拳道无论是从改革时间、推广途径、对外传播、练习人数、国际比赛最高组织形式都明显高于散打；现代武术散打的攻防特征倾向于防守后的反击，其观赏性明显不如跆拳道的对踢技术风格；跆拳道规则统一，评判标准相对简单，而相比之下，散打的规则随意性较大。建议：我国要从文化的高度来审视武术散打，加快向外推广的步伐，提倡散打终身教育模式。