The change of the administrative litigation judgment is a reflection of the development of judicial practice and the resolution of administrative disputes. There is room for further expansion of the change of judgments in administrative litigation; basically are the change of administrative compulsory measures and the time of the administrative act. Based on the distinction between "adverse amount"and"benefit amount, "the amount of "administrative punishment"and the amount of "other administrative actions" should be determined by applying different standards for review and change. There is a coincidence between "revocation of judgment in administrative litigation"and "alteration of judgment in administrative litigation". After measuring the value and purpose of litigation efficiency, reducing the burden of litigation, burden of proof and administrative cheapness, judges choose whether to apply the alteration judgment or not. Based on the consideration of "the plaintiff-type third party", the regulation of the alteration of judgment in administrative litigation is not appropriate to the exception condition of the"principle of prohibition of adverse change", and the exception for the"principle of prohibition of adverse change"may be further expanded.%行政诉讼变更判决是适应司法实践发展和实质解决行政争议的产物.行政诉讼变更判决的适用范围有进一步扩大的空间, 主要是针对行政强制措施和行政行为作出时间的变更.在区分"损益型款额"和"受益型款额"的基础上, "行政处罚"的款额和"其他行政行为"的款额确定应适用不同的审查和变更标准."行政诉讼撤销判决"与"行政诉讼变更判决"存在竞合, 法官在衡量诉讼效益、减少诉累、举证责任、行政便宜等价值和目的后选择是否适用变更判决.基于"原告型第三人"的考虑, 行政诉讼变更判决规范对"禁止不利变更原则"例外条件的规定是不够完善的, "禁止不利变更原则"的例外有进一步扩大的空间.
展开▼
