《管子》与《淮南子》农业生态观之比较

摘要

Guanzi and Huainanzi involve rich agricultural ecological thought , and there is an intrinsic historical link between them .Both emphasize on the political nature of agricultural production and adhere to the agriculture-oriented concept;On this basis , the agricultural theory highlights the harmonious rela-tionship of human and nature .With reflections on the limitations of the human agricultural activities , both are against excessive interference and impact on the natural ecology .Compared with Huainanzi , there is less ecological influence of Taoism and more influence of business in Guanzi , However , the eco-logical concept of harmony between human and nature has far-reaching influence on the former , as that is its important resources of inheriting and integration of agriculture ecological thought .%《管子》与《淮南子》都蕴含丰富的农业生态思想，而且二者之间具有内在的历史联系。强调农业生产的政治性，坚持“农本”理念，是《管子》与《淮南子》农业生态观的理论前提；在此基础上，二者论农都凸显出天人关系的特殊性，主张天、地、人相和谐的生态发展；二者都反对人类对自然生态的过度干扰和影响，深刻反思人类农业活动的现实的局限性。与《淮南子》相较，《管子》农业观在生态意蕴上缺乏更为浓厚的黄老道家气息，且其农本立场受到“重商”思想的一定影响，但《管子》所主张天、地、人相和谐的“三度”农业生态观对前者影响深远，成为其农业生态思想得以承继与融会的重要资源。