首页> 外文期刊>农业科学学报(英文版) >Accuracy comparison of dry matter intake prediction models evaluated by a feeding trial of lactating dairy cows fed two total mixed rations with different forage source
【24h】

Accuracy comparison of dry matter intake prediction models evaluated by a feeding trial of lactating dairy cows fed two total mixed rations with different forage source

机译:通过饲喂两种不同日粮的混合日粮的泌乳奶牛的饲喂试验评估的干物质摄入量预测模型的准确性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dry matter intake (DMI) prediction models of NRC (2001),Fox et aL (2004) and Fuentes-Pila et aL (2003) were targeted in the present study,and the objective was to evaluate their prediction accuracy with feeding trial data of 32 lactating Holstein cows fed two total mixed rations with different forage source.Thirty-two cows were randomly assigned to one of two total mixed ration groups:a ration containing a mixed forage (MF) of 3.7% Chinese wildrye,28.4% alfalfa hay and 26.5% corn silage diet and another ration containing 33.8% corn stover (CS) as unique forage source.The actual DMI was greater in MF group than in CS group (P=0.064).The NRC model to predict DMI resulted in the lowest root mean square prediction error for both MF and CS groups (1.09 kg d-1 vs.1.28 kg d-1) and the highest accuracy and precision based on concordance correlation coefficient for both MF and CS diet (0.89 vs.0.87).Except the NRC model,the other two models presented mean and linear biases in both MF and CS diets when prediction residuals were plotted against predicted DMI values (P<0.001).The DMI variation in MF was caused by week of lactation (55.6%),milk yield (13.9%),milk fat percentage (7.1%) and dietary neutral detergent fiber (13.3%),while the variation in CS was caused by week of lactation (50.9%),live body weight (28.2%),milk yield (8.4%),milk fat percentage (5.2%) and dietary neutral detergent fibre (3.8%).In a brief,the NRC model to predict DMI is comparatively acceptable for lactating dairy cows fed two total mixed rations with different forage source.
机译:本研究以NRC(2001),Fox等(2004)和Fuentes-Pila等(2003)的干物质摄入量(DMI)预测模型为目标,目的是通过饲喂试验数据评估它们的预测准确性。 32头泌乳的荷斯坦奶牛饲喂了两种不同日粮的混合饲料,其中32头母牛被随机分为两个总日粮组之一:一种日粮中含有3.7%的中国黑麦,28.4%的苜蓿干草和玉米青贮饲料占26.5%,另一种日粮含33.8%的玉米秸秆(CS)作为唯一的饲料来源。MF组的实际DMI大于CS组(P = 0.064)。NRC模型预测DMI导致最低的根MF和CS饮食的均方预测误差(1.09 kg d-1对1.28 kg d-1)和基于MF和CS饮食的一致相关系数的最高准确度和精密度(0.89 vs.0.87)。 NRC模型,另外两个模型在MF和CS模头中均值和线性偏差绘制预测残差与预测DMI值时的差异(P <0.001)。MF中DMI的变化是由泌乳周(55.6%),牛奶产量(13.9%),牛奶脂肪百分比(7.1%)和饮食中性清洁剂引起的纤维(13.3%),而CS的变化是由于泌乳周(50.9%),活体重(28.2%),牛奶产量(8.4%),乳脂率(5.2%)和饮食中性洗涤剂纤维(简而言之,NRC模型预测的DMI在饲喂两种不同日粮和不同饲料来源的混合奶牛的情况下是可以接受的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《农业科学学报(英文版)》 |2017年第4期|921-929|共9页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R.China;

    University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Precision Livestock and Nutrition, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium;

    State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R.China;

    University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Precision Livestock and Nutrition, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium;

    State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R.China;

    Beijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, P.R.China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号