长期以来,停止侵害的救济方式被认为是判定专利侵权后的当然结果。但是,我国专利法领域中的侵权责任不同于传统大陆法系国家的侵权责任,并不仅仅把侵权行为视为债的发生原因之一,侵权责任也不仅包括损害赔偿。因而,停止侵害请求权不宜被视为一种绝对权的请求权,而应当基于侵权责任产生。美国法上＂永久禁令＂制度为我国重构专利侵权救济中的停止侵害制度提供了一条新的思路。应当重新思考,在限制停止侵害救济当然适用的基础上,重构我国专利法中的停止侵害制度。%In a long period,cessation of the infringement has been considered as an inevitable result of patent infringement.However,the liability of tort in our patent law doesn＇t treat the tort as one of the reason of debit,and doesn＇t include damage compensation either,which is different compared with the one in Civil Law system.Thus,it is not suitable to consider cessation of the infringement as one of the cause of debt,but should be generated based on tort liability.The transition of permanent injunction institution in U.S has paved a new road for cessation of the infringement in re-constructing our system of remedies for patent infringement.It is necessary to take a second thought and re-constructed the institution of stop-infringement in our patent law based on automatically apply to restrict relief cessation of the infringement.
展开▼
