毋康蚤死，无子嗣，《离骚》之伯庸有子嗣，则毋康与伯庸无关。“熊毋康”、“无康”当作“孟康”。句亶王与伯庸无关。句亶王的封地在“江上楚蛮之地”，则句亶王的封地与屈氏无关。句亶王、鄂王、越章王中之句亶、鄂、越章非为熊渠统治区域之内之地名。所谓“客卿产生于战国而不见于春秋”之说根本不能成立。楚武王子瑕是从周受屈为客卿，瑕采食之屈地就是今山西省吉县县城正北七公里处，此为屈氏起源之地。%According to material in Shi Ji ( Historical Records ) , Wukang (毋康) had no son for his early death.While it was recorded in Lisao that Boyong (伯庸) had descendants;therefore, Wukang (毋康) has no relation to Boyong (伯庸) .Xiong Wukang (熊毋康) or Wukang (无康) should be Mengkang (孟康) .Be-sides , King Goudan (句亶王) has no relation to Boyong (伯庸) .The feud of King Goudan (句亶王) was loca-ted in the southern region of the Yangtze River , thus having no relation to Qu ’ s family .The “亶” in “句亶王(King Goudan)”,“鄂 (e)” in “鄂王 (King E)” and “越章 (yuezhang)” in “越章王 (King Yuezhang)”were not the place names in the ruling region of Xiong Qu .The saying that “Keqing (客卿, a person from one feu-dal state serving in the court of another ) ” appeared in the Warring States Times and not in the Spring -Autumn Times is false .Xia, the son of King Wu of Chu , served as a Keqing of Zhou with the feod of Qu , where is seven kilometer due north from Ji county in Shanxi province .The family name of Qu was consequently originated from the name of this region .
展开▼
