恐怖主义犯罪调查程序与人权保障研究--基于我国《反恐怖主义法》相关问题的探讨

摘要

对恐怖主义犯罪的调查程序面临着保障国家安全与保障公民个人权利、行政权与司法权、实体正义与程序正义的价值冲突，在立法和司法实践中必须对以上三种冲突予以平衡。尤其要重视为过度构建保障国家安全而导致行政调查权力的扩张滥用、实体正义凌驾于程序正义之上，以及忽略司法权对人权保障的救济机制等问题的出现。%The procedure of investigating terrorism crime faces conflicts between protecting national security and protecting citizens’ personal rights, between administrative power and judicial power, between substantive justice and procedural justice, which need to be balanced in the legislative and judicial practice. More attention should be paid to administrative investigation power abuse, substantive justice superior to procedural justice and the ignorance of judicial power to protect human rights caused by excessively protect national security.