首页> 外文期刊>畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版) >Methodological impact of starch determination on starch content and ileal digestibility of starch in grain legumes for growing pigs
【24h】

Methodological impact of starch determination on starch content and ileal digestibility of starch in grain legumes for growing pigs

机译:淀粉测定方法对成年猪谷物豆类中淀粉含量和回肠消化率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:Grain legumes represent a valuable energy source in pig diets due to their high starch content.The present study was conducted to determine the content and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of starch in different grain legume cultivars for pigs by means of both a polarimetric and enzymatic method for starch determination.Methods:Three experiments were conducted with six barrows each which were fitted with ileal T-cannulas.In total,18 diets including six different cultivars of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) and peas (Pisum sativum L.),five different cultivars of lupins (Lupinus luteus L.,Lupinus angustifolius L.),and one diet with a soybean meal (SBM) were fed.Results:The starch content of faba beans and peas was greater (P < 0.05) when determined polarimetrically than enzymatically (438 vs.345 g/kg dry matter (DM) in faba beans and 509 vs.390 g/kg DM in peas,respectively).Considerable lower starch contents were obtained in lupins and SBM,with 82 and 48 g/kg DM (analyzed polarimetrically) and <1.1 and 3 g/kg DM (analyzed enzymatically),respectively.Mean values for contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) in grain legumes ranged from 111 and 79 g/kg DM in peas to 248 and 207 g/kg DM in lupins,respectively.Contents of condensed tannins in the colored flowered faba bean cultivars ranged from 2.1 to 7.4 g/kg DM.The AID of starch was greater (P< 0.05) in pea than in faba bean cultivars,and using the polarimetric starch determination method resulted in greater (P < 0.05) digestibility values than using enzymatic starch analysis (84 vs.80% in faba beans and 86 vs.83% in peas).Moreover,AID of starch differed (P < 0.05) within pea cultivars and starch digestibility in faba beans decreased linearly (P < 0.05) as the content of condensed tannins increased.However,there was no relationship between contents of NDF and ADF and AID of starch in pea and faba bean cultivars.Conclusion:Both contents and AID of starch in grain legumes can vary as influenced by the analytical method used for starch determination.Generally,starch digestibility is greater when measured by polarimetric rather than enzymatic methods.
机译:背景:杂粮豆类由于其淀粉含量高而成为猪日粮中的宝贵能量来源。本研究旨在通过偏光法测定不同谷物豆科品种猪中淀粉的含量和表观回肠消化率(AID)。方法:采用六个回肠T-canrowlas进行了三个实验,共进行了三个实验。总共有18种饮食,包括六种不同的蚕豆(豌豆)和豌豆(Pisum sativum L)。 ),饲喂5个不同品种的羽扇豆(Lupinus luteus L.,Lupinus angustifolius L.),并用一种​​豆粕(SBM)饮食。结果:蚕豆和豌豆的淀粉含量更高(P <0.05)分别用极化法和酶法测定(蚕豆中分别为438 vs.345 g / kg干物质(DM),豌豆中分别为509 vs.390 g / kg DM)。羽扇豆和SBM的淀粉含量低得多,分别为82和48克/千克DM(经分析的Polarim分别<1.2和3 g / kg DM(通过酶法分析)。豌豆中豆类中性洗涤剂纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤剂纤维(ADF)的含量平均值分别为111和79 g / kg DM羽扇豆的DM分别为248和207 g / kg DM。彩色花蚕豆品种中单宁的浓缩单宁含量在2.1到7.4 g / kg DM之间。豌豆中淀粉的AID大于(P <0.05)大豆品种,使用极化淀粉测定法比酶法淀粉分析法得到的消化率值更高(P <0.05)(蚕豆为84 vs.80%,豌豆为86 vs.83%)。此外,淀粉的AID也有所不同豌豆品种中的(P <0.05)和蚕豆的淀粉消化率均随着浓缩单宁含量的增加而线性下降(P <0.05)。但是,豌豆和蚕豆中NDF和ADF的含量与淀粉的AID无关。结论:谷物豆类中淀粉的含量和AID可随以下因素而变化:通常,通过极化法而不是酶法测量时,淀粉的消化率更高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版)》 |2017年第2期|459-466|共8页
  • 作者单位

    University of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Science, Emil-Wolff-Strasse 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany;

    University of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Science, Emil-Wolff-Strasse 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany;

    Agricultural Analytic and Research Institute Speyer, Obere Langgasse 40, 67346 Speyer, Germany;

    University of Hohenheim, Core Facility Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Strasse 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany;

    University of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Science, Emil-Wolff-Strasse 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 04:07:17
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号