首页> 外文期刊>畜牧与生物技术杂志:英文版 >Evaluation of fatty acid metabolism and innate immunity interactions between commercial broiler, F1 layer × broiler cross and commercial layer strains selected for different growth potentials
【24h】

Evaluation of fatty acid metabolism and innate immunity interactions between commercial broiler, F1 layer × broiler cross and commercial layer strains selected for different growth potentials

机译:评估商业肉鸡,F1层×肉鸡杂交和商业层肉鸡针对不同生长潜力选择的脂肪酸代谢和先天免疫相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The broiler industry has undergone intense genetic selection over the past 50 yr. resulting in improvements for growth and feed efficiency, however, significant variation remains for performance and growth traits. Production improvements have been coupled with unfavourable metabolic consequences, including immunological trade-offs for growth, and excess fat deposition. To determine whether interactions between fatty acid(FA) metabolism and innate immunity may be associated with performance variations commonly seen within commercial broiler flocks, total carcass lipid %, carcass and blood FA composition, as wel as genes involved with FA metabolism, immunity and cel ular stress were investigated in male birds of a broiler strain, layer strain and F1 layer × broiler cross at d 14 post hatch. Heterophil:lymphocyte ratios, relative organ weights and bodyweight data were also compared.Results: Broiler bodyweight(n = 12) was four times that of layers(n = 12) by d 14 and had significantly higher carcass fat percentage compared to the cross(n = 6; P = 0.002) and layers(P = 0.017) which were not significantly different from each other(P = 0.523). The carcass and whole blood FA analysis revealed differences in the FA composition between the three groups indicating altered FA metabolism, despite al being raised on the same diet. Genes associated with FA synthesis andβ-oxidation were upregulated in the broilers compared to the layers indicating a net overal increase in FA metabolism,which may be driven by the larger relative liver size as a percentage of bodyweight in the broilers. Genes involved in innate immunity such as TLR2 and TLR4, as wel as organel e stress indicators ERN1 and XBP1 were found to be nonsignificant, with the exception of high expression levels of XBP1 in layers compared to the cross and broilers. Additional y there was no difference in heterophil: lymphocytes between any of the birds.Conclusions: The results provide evidence that genetic selection may be associated with altered metabolic processes between broilers, layers and their F1 cross. Whilst there is no evidence of interactions between FA metabolism, innate immunity or cel ular stress, further investigations at later time points as growth and fat deposition increase would provide useful information as to the effects of divergent selection on key metabolic and immunological processes.
机译:背景:肉鸡产业在过去的50年过去经历了强烈的遗传选择。然而,导致增长和饲料效率的改善,性能和生长性状仍然存在显着的变化。生产改进已经与不利的代谢后果相结合,包括生长和过量脂肪沉积的免疫折衷。为了确定脂肪酸(Fa)代谢和先天性免疫之间的相互作用是否可能与商业肉鸡群中的性能变化相关联,总胴体脂质%,胴体和血液成分组成,如涉及FA代谢,免疫力和CEL所涉及的基因在D 14后舱口的雄性菌株,层应变和F1层×肉鸡交叉的雄性鸟类中研究了ULAR应激。 HOLIONOPIL:淋巴细胞比率,相对器官重量和体重数据进行了比较。结果:肉鸡体重(n = 12)是D 14的层(n = 12)的四倍,并且与十字架相比具有显着更高的胴体脂肪百分比( n = 6; p = 0.002)和层(p = 0.017),其彼此没有显着不同(p = 0.523)。胴体和全血FA分析表明,尽管AL在同样的饮食中提出,但三组指出的三组组成的差异。与表明FA代谢的净多种增加的层相比,在肉仔鸡中升高了与FA合成和β-氧化的基因,这可以由较大的相对肝脏大小作为肉鸡体重的百分比驱动。参与先天免疫的基因,如TLR2和TLR4,作为组织物E应激指示符ERN1和XBP1被发现不显着,除了与交叉和肉鸡相比层的高表达水平的XBP1。额外的y handophil:任何鸟类之间的淋巴细胞。结论:结果提供了遗传选择可以与肉鸡,层和它们的F1交叉之间的改变的代谢过程相关。虽然没有发酵代谢,先天性免疫或CEL ular压力之间的相互作用的证据,但在稍后的时间点进一步调查作为生长和脂肪沉积的增加将提供有用的信息,以及分歧选择对关键代谢和免疫过程的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《畜牧与生物技术杂志:英文版》 |2018年第001期|P.156-166|共11页
  • 作者单位

    School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    The Australian Poultry and Cooperative Research Centre,University of New England;

    Davies Research Centre,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Livestock and Farming Systems;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Pig and Poultry Production Institute;

    School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    The Australian Poultry and Cooperative Research Centre,University of New England;

    Davies Research Centre,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Livestock and Farming Systems;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Pig and Poultry Production Institute;

    School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    The Australian Poultry and Cooperative Research Centre,University of New England;

    Davies Research Centre,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Livestock and Farming Systems;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Pig and Poultry Production Institute;

    School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    The Australian Poultry and Cooperative Research Centre,University of New England;

    Davies Research Centre,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Livestock and Farming Systems;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Pig and Poultry Production Institute;

    School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    The Australian Poultry and Cooperative Research Centre,University of New England;

    Davies Research Centre,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Livestock and Farming Systems;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Pig and Poultry Production Institute;

    School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    The Australian Poultry and Cooperative Research Centre,University of New England;

    Davies Research Centre,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,The University of Adelaide;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Livestock and Farming Systems;

    South Australian Research and Development Institute(SARDI),Pig and Poultry Production Institute;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 CHI
  • 中图分类 鸡;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号