首页> 外文期刊>国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版) >Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma:A time to revisit a dogma?
【24h】

Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma:A time to revisit a dogma?

机译:对病理性和临床分期胰腺腺癌的第8期AJCC分期系统的评估:是时候重温教条了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pan-creatic exocrine adenocarcinoma has been released. The current study seeks to assess the 7th and 8th editions among patients registered within the surveillance,epidemiology and end results(SEER)database. Methods: SEER database(2010–2013)has been accessed through SEER?Stat program and AJCC 8th edition stages were reconstructed utilizing the collaborative stage descriptions. Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and pancreatic cancer-specific survival analyses (according to both 7th and 8th editions and ac-cording to whether pathological or clinical staging were conducted) has been performed. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting pancreatic cancer-specific survival was also conducted through a Cox propor-tional hazard model. Results: A total of 18 948 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified in the period from 2010–2013. Pancreatic cancer-specific survival among pathologically staged patients and according to the 8th edition showed significant differences for all pair wise comparisons among different stages (P<0.0001) except for the comparison between stage IA and stage IB (P=0.307) and the comparison between stage IB and stage IIA (P=0.116). Moreover, P value for stage IA vs IIA was 0.014; while pan-creatic cancer-specific survival according to the 7th edition among pathologically staged patients showed significant differences for all pair wise comparisons among different stages (P<0.0001) except for the comparison between IA and IB(P=0.072),the comparison between stage IIA and stage IIB(P=0.065),the comparison between stage IIA and stage III(P=0.059)and the comparison between IIB and III(P=0.595). Among clinically staged patients (i.e. those who did not undergo initial radical surgery), the prognostic performance of both 7th and 8th stages for both overall survival and pancreatic cancer-specific survival was limited. Conclusion: There is clearly a need to have two staging systems for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: patho-logical and clinical staging systems.
机译:背景:用于胰腺外分泌腺癌的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统第8版已发布。当前的研究旨在评估在监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中注册的患者的第7版和第8版。方法:通过SEER?Stat程序访问SEER数据库(2010-2013),并利用协作阶段描述重建AJCC第8版阶段。进行了Kaplan–Meier总体生存率分析和胰腺癌特异性生存率分析(根据第7版和第8版,以及是否进行了病理或临床分期)。还通过Cox比例风险模型对影响胰腺癌特异性生存的因素进行了多变量分析。结果:在2010年至2013年期间,共鉴定出18 948例胰腺腺癌患者。病理分期患者之间的胰腺癌特异性生存率(根据第8版)显示了不同阶段之间所有成对比较的显着差异(P <0.0001),除了IA期和IB期之间的比较(P = 0.307)和IB期和IIA期(P = 0.116)。此外,IA阶段与IIA阶段的P值为0.014;在病理分期患者中,根据第七版的胰腺癌特异性生存率在不同阶段之间的所有成对比较中显示出显着差异(P <0.0001),除了IA和IB之间的比较(P = 0.072)之外, IIA期和IIB期(P = 0.065),IIA期和IIIB期的比较(P = 0.059)以及IIB期和IIIB期的比较(P = 0.595)。在临床分期的患者中(即那些没有接受过首次根治性手术的患者),第7和第8阶段的总体生存期和胰腺癌特异性生存期的预后表现有限。结论:胰腺腺癌显然有两个分期系统:病理学和临床分期系统。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)》 |2018年第001期|64-69|共6页
  • 作者

    Omar Abdel-Rahman;

  • 作者单位

    Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:39:12
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号