首页> 外文期刊>综合精神医学(英文) >Clergy as a frontline mental health service:a UK survey of medical practitioners and clergy
【24h】

Clergy as a frontline mental health service:a UK survey of medical practitioners and clergy

机译:神职人员作为前线心理健康服务:英国对医学从业者和神职人员的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Christian clergy have often been identified as''frontline mental health workers''and gatekeepers to mental health services.However,despite this,collaboration between clergy and mental health services remains poor,with some US clergy referring on as little as 10%of cases.Aims In this study,we aimed to evaluate the collaborative relationship between UK clergy and medical practitioners,with the purpose of identifying key issues that should be addressed to improve such collaboration between the two services.Methods We surveyed 124 clergy,48 general practitioners and 13 psychiatrists in Wales.Part 1 of the survey covered four main themes:demographics;types of mental health cases seen by clergy and practitioners;referral rates between clergy and mental health services;attitude and relationship between clergy and mental health services.Part 2 was directed at clergy only and assessed how sensitive clergy were in identifying and referring on mental health disorders by using seven virtual case vignettes.Results Clergy frequently encountered mental health cases and around 60%-80%regularly referred on to a healthcare professional.Clergy appeared very effective at identifying and referring on high risk scenarios,such as psychosis,suicidal ideation and substance misuse,however were less effective at identifying and referring on clinical depression and anxiety.Clergy rarely received referrals from medical professionals.Both medical professionals and clergy felt they needed to engage in a more collaborative relationship,and around of onethird of practitioners were prepared to offer training to clergy.Conclusion Most clergy in Wales regularly encounter mental health cases and appear effective at recognising and referring on mental health disorders;however,a large minority do not(20%-40%).Clergy generally do not receive referrals from mental health professionals,despite the proven benefits.Therefore,improving collaboration,developing spiritual training for mental health professionals,and mental health training for clergy is likely useful,a notion that many clergy and medical professionals deem important and are prepared to support.
机译:背景技术Christian Clergy经常被识别为“海滨精神卫生工作者”的守门人。然而,尽管这一点,神职人员和精神卫生服务之间的合作仍然很差,但一些美国神职人员指的是只需10%案件。我们旨在评估英国神职人员与医生之间的协作关系,目的是确定应解决的关键问题,以改善两种服务之间的这种合作。我们调查了124名职员,48名普通从业人员威尔士的13个精神科医生。调查的第1部分涵盖了四个主要主题:人口统计学;神职人员和从业者看到的心理健康病例;神职人员与心理健康服务之间的推荐率;神职人员与心理健康服务之间的态度和关系。第2条仅针对神职人员,并评估了敏感的神职人员如何通过使用七个vir识别和提及心理健康障碍TUANTESTES.Results Clergy经常遇到精神健康案例,经常转到医疗保健专业人员的60%-80%左右60%-80%。然而,在识别和提及精神病,自杀性想法和物质滥用方面非常有效地呈现出非常有效的。然而在识别和提及临床抑制和焦虑时效果效果不太有效.Chergy很少收到医学专业人员的推荐。据命医疗专业人员和神职人员认为他们需要参与更具协作的关系,并且正在为职员提供竞争训练,以便为神职人员提供培训。威尔士的职员定期遇到精神健康病例,似乎有效地识别和提及心理健康疾病;然而,少数少数群体没有(20%-40%)。尽管如此,神职人员通常不会收到精神卫生专业人士的推荐经过验证的好处。因此,改善合作,为心理健康发育精神培训神职人员和神职人员的心理健康培训很可能是有用的,这是许多神职人员和医疗专业人士认为重要的概念,并准备支持。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号