To solve the problem of high cost of automobile recycling caused by enterprise advantages failing to be concentrated in the existing model of end-of-life vehicle recycling, a value chain integrated recovery model is put forward. Based on the competitive advantage theory and the value chain theory, a comparative analysis is made on the advantages and disadvantages of the three traditional recycling models of major en-terprise including manufacturers, third-party logistics enterprises, professional automobile recycling compa-nies and retailers, and then a cost-benefit model of reverse logistics mode dominated by manufacturers en-terprises is established, which can conduct the cost comparative analysis of the main body enterprises. Then the competitive advantages of value chain link of every enterprise in the reverse supply chain are shown, and all the links of the competitive advantages integrated to build the integrated model of reverse supply chain. Finally, a conclusion is drawn that the net income of the integrated recovery model is larger in certain conditions by comparing and verifying the net income of the integrated recovery model and the traditional recovery model.%为解决现有废旧汽车回收模式中企业优势无法集中而导致的回收成本高的问题,提出了一种价值链集成式回收模式.基于比较优势理论和价值链理论,分别比较分析了传统3种回收模式中制造商、第三方物流企业、专业汽车回收企业和零售商等回收主体企业的优劣势,并且以制造商为主导企业建立逆向物流模式的成本-收益模型,对各主体企业进行成本比较分析,得到各主体企业在逆向供应链中具有相对优势的价值链环节,并将其各自具有相对优势的环节进行集成,构建集成式的逆向供应链模型.最后通过集成式回收模式与传统的回收模式的净收益对比和验证,得出在一定条件下集成式回收模式的净收益较大的结论.
展开▼
