首页> 外文期刊>统计学期刊(英文) >Effects of Multicollinearity on Type I Error of Some Methods of Detecting Heteroscedasticity in Linear Regression Model
【24h】

Effects of Multicollinearity on Type I Error of Some Methods of Detecting Heteroscedasticity in Linear Regression Model

机译:多型性对线性回归模型中检测异源性的几种方法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Heteroscedasticity and multicollinearity are serious problems when they exist in econometrics data. These problems exist as a result of violating the assumptions of equal variance between the error terms and that of independence between the explanatory variables of the model. With these assumption violations, Ordinary Least Square Estimator (OLS) will not give best linear unbiased, efficient and consistent estimator. In practice, there are several structures of heteroscedasticity and several methods of heteroscedasticity detection. For better estimation result, best heteroscedasticity detection methods must be determined for any structure of heteroscedasticity in the presence of multicollinearity between the explanatory variables of the model. In this paper we examine the effects of multicollinearity on type I error rates of some methods of heteroscedasticity detection in linear regression model in other to determine the best method of heteroscedasticity detection to use when both problems exist in the model. Nine heteroscedasticity detection methods were considered with seven heteroscedasticity structures. Simulation study was done via a Monte Carlo experiment on a multiple linear regression model with 3 explanatory variables. This experiment was conducted 1000 times with linear model parameters of β0 = 4 , β1 = 0.4 , β2= 1.5 and β3 = 3.6. Five (5) levels of mulicollinearity are with seven (7) different sample sizes. The method’s performances were compared with the aids of set confidence interval (C.I. style="font-family:Verdana;">) criterion. Results showed that whenever multicollinearity exists in the model with any forms of heteroscedasticity structures, Breusch-Godfrey (BG) test is the best method to determine the existence of heteroscedasticity at all chosen levels of significance.
机译:当在经济学数据中存在时,异源性和多元素是严重的问题。由于违反了误差术语与模型的解释变量与模型的解释变量之间的独立性之间的相同方差的假设存在这些问题。通过这些假设违规,普通的最小二乘估计器(OLS)不会提供最好的线性无偏见,高效且一致的估计。在实践中,存在几种异源性和几种异源性检测方法的结构。为了更好的估计结果,必须在模型的解释变量之间存在多元族性存在的异源性的任何结构来确定最佳的异源性度检测方法。在本文中,我们研究了在线性回归模型中某些异疗性检测方法I型误差率的影响,以确定模型中两个问题时使用的异素检测的最佳方法。用七种异源性结构考虑九个异源性检测方法。仿真研究是通过蒙特卡罗实验在多元线性回归模型上进行,具有3个解释性变量。该实验进行1000次,线性模型参数β0= 4,β1= 0.4,β2= 1.5和β3= 3.6。五(5)水平的覆盖物性具有7(7)个不同的样本尺寸。将该方法的性能与集合置信区间(C.I. )标准进行了比较。结果表明,每当具有任何形式的异源性结构的模型中存在多型性,BREUSCH-GODFREY(BG)测试是确定在所有所选择的显着性水平上确定异源性的最佳方法。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号