首页> 外文期刊>中国医学科学杂志:英文版 >INTEGRATION OF TRADITIONAL AND MODERN METHODS IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF AFB CULTURES ISOLATED FROM CLINICAL SPECIMENS OF PATIENTS WITH SKIN DISEASES
【24h】

INTEGRATION OF TRADITIONAL AND MODERN METHODS IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF AFB CULTURES ISOLATED FROM CLINICAL SPECIMENS OF PATIENTS WITH SKIN DISEASES

机译:传统和现代方法相结合,鉴定患有皮肤疾病的患者临床标本中分离出的AFB文化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article reports the identification of 57 AFB cultures isolated from clinical specimens by using traditional methods(TM,including biochemical and cultural methods) and modern ELISA with monoclonal antibody(McAb-ELISA) and nested primer gene amplification assay(NPGAA.)The representive AFB culture M.A1,A7,A19,A21 AND A22) isolated from human lepromas were identified as new species by TM and it was shown that they were not identical to M.leprae by McAb-ELISA and NPGAA.Among another set of samples(M.S17,S1,S2,S2R,S7,S29),M.S17 waas identical to M.scrofulaceum as assessed by TM only,while the others were found to be simlar to M.tuberculsis and different from M.leprae using TM and McAb-ELISA,and identical to M.tuberculosis with NPGAA.The authors conclude that TM and MM are very useful for identifying mycobacteria,while MM was much more sensitive and specific than TM.The selection and use of these methods depends on practical need.
机译:本文报道了使用传统方法(TM,包括生化和培养方法)和现代ELISA单克隆抗体(McAb-ELISA)和嵌套引物基因扩增测定法(NPGAA)鉴定从临床标本中分离的57种AFB培养物的方法。通过TM鉴定从人麻风病分离的培养物M.A1,A7,A19,A21和A22为新物种,并且通过McAb-ELISA和NPGAA证明它们与麻风分枝杆菌不相同。仅通过TM评估,M.S17,S1,S2,S2R,S7,S29)与M.scrofulaceum相同,而其他发现与结核分枝杆菌类似,而使用TM与麻风杆菌相似作者认为,TM和MM对于鉴定分枝杆菌非常有用,而MM比TM更敏感和更特异性。这些方法的选择和使用取决于实际需要。 。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号