首页> 中文期刊> 《中国实验诊断学》 >多药耐药鲍曼不动杆菌耐药基因与其耐药表型关系的分析

多药耐药鲍曼不动杆菌耐药基因与其耐药表型关系的分析

         

摘要

Objective OBJECTIVE To investigate the drug-resistant mechanism of Multi-drug Acinetobacter Bau-mannii (MDRAB),thus providing a theoretical basis for the effective treatment of MDRAB in clinical.Methods Drug-resistant gene sequencings for 94 MDRAB were made by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).Drug resistances were contrasted between positive group and the negative group of 8 drug resistance genes of MDRAB.Results The detection rates of 8 drug resistance genes were VIM 35.1%,SIM 55.0%,TEM 59.6%,OXA-23 93.6%,OXA-24 52.1%,SHV 52.1%,PER-1 83.0%,IMP 2.1%.Drug resistance of Imipenem (IPM),meropenem (MEM),Ampicillin/Sulbactam (SAM)were only found to be significantly different between the positive group and negative group of OXA-23 gene. And drug resistance of SAM was only found to be significantly different between the positive group and negative group of SIM gene.Conclusion This study revealed that drug-resistant gene sequencing of MDRAB could not replace the nor-mal drug susceptibility testing,for its unpredictable clinical therapeutic effect.Besides,Minocycline (MH)and Poly-myxin B (PO)were still the better treatment in MDRAB.%目的:研究多药耐药鲍曼不动杆菌(MDRAB)的耐药机制,为临床有效治疗该菌感染提供依据。方法应用 PCR 技术对94株 MDRAB 进行耐药基因检测,比较8种耐药基因阳性组与阴性组菌株的耐药性。结果耐药基因检出率:VIM 35.1%、SIM 55.0%、TEM 59.6%、OXA-2393.6%、OXA-2452.1%、SHV 52.1%、PER-183.0%、IMP 2.1%;仅 IPM、MEM、SAM 在 OXA-23基因阳性组与阴性组间,和 SAM 在 SIM 基因阳性组与阴性组间的耐药性有显著差异。结论 MDRAB 耐药基因检测不能代替常规药敏试验,无法预测临床治疗效果;MH、PO 仍为治疗MDRAB 的较好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号