首页> 外文期刊>中国林学(英文版) >Evaluating the impact of sampling schemes on leaf area index measurements from digital hemispherical photography in Larix principis-rupprechtii forest plots
【24h】

Evaluating the impact of sampling schemes on leaf area index measurements from digital hemispherical photography in Larix principis-rupprechtii forest plots

机译:评估采样方案对落叶松林 - 罗普(Rupprechtii森林地块数字半球摄影叶面积指数测量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:Digital hemispherical photography(DHP)is widely used to estimate the leaf area index(LAI)of forest plots due to its advantages of high efficiency and low cost.A crucial step in the LAI estimation of forest plots via DHP is choosing a sampling scheme.However,various sampling schemes involving DHP have been used for the LAI estimation of forest plots.To date,the impact of sampling schemes on LAI estimation from DHP has not been comprehensively investigated.Methods:In this study,13 commonly used sampling schemes which belong to five sampling types(i.e.dispersed,square,cross,transect and circle)were adopted in the LAI estimation of five Larix principis-rupprechtii plots(25m×25 m).An additional sampling scheme(with a sample size of 89)was generated on the basis of all the sample points of the 13 sampling schemes.Three typical inversion models and four canopy element clumping index(Ωe)algorithms were involved in the LAI estimation.The impacts of the sampling schemes on four variables,including gap fraction,Ωe,effective plant area index(PAIe)and LAI estimation from DHP were analysed.The LAI estimates obtained with different sampling schemes were then compared with those obtained from litter collection measurements.Results:Large differences were observed for all four variable estimates(i.e.gap fraction,Ωe,PAIe and LAI)under different sampling schemes.The differences in impact of sampling schemes on LAI estimation were not obvious for the three inversion models,if the fourΩe algorithms,except for the traditional gap-size analysis algorithm were adopted in the estimation.The accuracy of LAI estimation was not always improved with an increase in sample size.Moreover,results indicated that with the appropriate inversion model,Ωe algorithm and sampling scheme,the maximum estimation error of DHP-estimated LAI at elementary sampling unit can be less than 20%,which is required by the global climate observing system,except in forest plots with extremely large LAI values(~>6.0).However,obtaining an LAI from DHP with an estimation error lower than 5%is impossible regardless of which combination of inversion model,Ωe algorithm and sampling scheme is used.Conclusion:The LAI estimation of L.principis-rupprechtii forests from DHP was largely affected by the sampling schemes adopted in the estimation.Thus,the sampling scheme should be seriously considered in the LAI estimation.One square and two transect sampling schemes(with sample sizes ranging from 3 to 9)were recommended to be used to estimate the LAI of L.principis-rupprechtii forests with the smallest mean relative error(MRE).By contrast,three cross and one dispersed sampling schemes were identified to provide LAI estimates with relatively large MREs.

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国林学(英文版)》 |2020年第4期|686-703|共18页
  • 作者单位

    The Academy of Digital China (Fujian) Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China;

    Key Laboratory of Data Mining and Information Sharing Ministry of Education Fuzhou 350116 ChinaThe Academy of Digital China (Fujian) Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China;

    Key Laboratory of Data Mining and Information Sharing Ministry of Education Fuzhou 350116 China;

    The Academy of Digital China (Fujian) Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China;

    Key Laboratory of Data Mining and Information Sharing Ministry of Education Fuzhou 350116 China;

    School of Forestry Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083 China;

    College of Environment and Resources Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China;

    The Academy of Digital China (Fujian) Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China;

    Key Laboratory of Data Mining and Information Sharing Ministry of Education Fuzhou 350116 China;

    Research Institute of Resources Insects Chinese Academy of Forestry Kunming 650224 China;

    Pu'er Forest Ecosystem Research Station National Forestry and Grassland Administration Kunming 650224 China;

    College of Resources and Environment Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Fuzhou 350002 China.;

    The Academy of Digital China (Fujian) Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 China;

    Key Laboratory of Data Mining and Information Sharing Ministry of Education Fuzhou 350116 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 04:52:45
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号