首页> 外文期刊>亚洲农业研究:英文版 >Canonical Correlation between the Leaf Quality Indicators of 'Moderate Aroma' Flue-cured Tobacco
【24h】

Canonical Correlation between the Leaf Quality Indicators of 'Moderate Aroma' Flue-cured Tobacco

机译:“中度香气”烤烟叶片质量指标之间的典型相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In order to find out the correlation between tobacco quality evaluation indicators in China’s traditional " moderate aroma" tobaccoproducing areas and simplify the tobacco quality evaluation indicators,we evaluate the appearance quality and smoking quality of 143 flue-cured tobacco leaf samples in China’s " moderate aroma" tobacco-producing areas,test the physical traits and chemical component,and analyze the canonical correlation between four quality evaluation indicators. The results show that there is significant or extremely significant canonical correlation between four evaluation indicators( tobacco smoking quality,chemical component,appearance quality and physical trait quality); the cumulative variance contribution rate of evaluation indicators is in the order of chemical component( 69. 17%) > appearance quality( 68. 76%) > physical traits( 64. 13%); appearance quality is most closely related to physical traits( 93. 84%). The individual indicators for tobacco quality evaluation make different contribution to the correlation between quality evaluation indicators. The chemical component evaluation indicators mainly include total sugar and ratio of total sugar to betaine; sensory taste indicators mainly include aroma volume,smoke concentration,irritation and softness degree; physical trait evaluation indicators mainly include leaf weight,leaf length and leaf density; appearance quality indicators mainly include leaf organizational structure,color,maturity and identity. Studies have shown that in the large-scale ecoregion,using canonical correlation analysis to simplify tobacco quality evaluation indicators is feasible.
机译:为了找出中国传统“中度香气”产区的烟叶质量评价指标之间的相关性,简化烟草质量评价指标,我们对中国“中度香气”区143个烤烟叶样的外观质量和吸烟质量进行了评价。产烟区,测试其物理特性和化学成分,并分析四个质量评价指标之间的典型相关性。结果表明,吸烟质量,化学成分,外观质量和身体特征质量这四个评价指标之间存在显着或极显着的正相关性。评价指标的累积方差贡献率依次为化学成分(69. 17%)>外观质量(68. 76%)>物理性状(64. 13%);外观质量与身体特征最密切相关(93. 84%)。烟草质量评估的各个指标对质量评估指标之间的相关性做出了不同的贡献。化学成分评价指标主要包括总糖和总糖与甜菜碱的比例。感官味觉指标主要包括香气量,烟气浓度,刺激性和柔软度。物理性状评价指标主要包括叶重,叶长和叶密度。外观质量指标主要包括叶片的组织结构,颜色,成熟度和特性。研究表明,在大型生态区中,采用典型相关分析简化烟草质量评价指标是可行的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号