首页> 外文期刊>海洋学报(英文版) >Comparison of TMI and AMSR-E sea surface temperatures with Argo near-surface temperatures over the global oceans
【24h】

Comparison of TMI and AMSR-E sea surface temperatures with Argo near-surface temperatures over the global oceans

机译:TMI和AMSR-E海表温度与全球海洋Argo近地表温度的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Satellite-derived sea surface temperatures (SSTs) from the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) microwave imager (TMI) and the advanced microwave scanning radiometer for the earth observing system (AMSR-E) were compared with non-pumped near-surface temperatures (NSTs) obtained from Argo profiling floats over the global oceans. Factors that might cause temperature differences were examined, including wind speed, columnar water vapor, liquid cloud water, and geographic location. The results show that both TMI and AMSR-E SSTs are highly correlated with the Argo NSTs; however, at low wind speeds, they are on average warmer than the Argo NSTs. The TMI performs slightly better than the AMSR-E at low wind speeds, whereas the TMI SST retrievals might be poorly calibrated at high wind speeds. The temperature differences indicate a warm bias of the TMI/AMSR-E when columnar water vapor is low, which can indicate that neither TMI nor AMSR-E SSTs are well calibrated at high latitudes. The SST in the Kuroshio Extension region has higher variability than in the Kuroshio region. The variability of the temperature difference between the satellite-retrieved SSTs and the Argo NSTs is lower in the Kuroshio Extension during spring. At low wind speeds, neither TMI nor AMSR-E SSTs are well calibrated, although the TMI performs better than the AMSR-E.
机译:将来自热带雨量测量任务(TRMM)微波成像仪(TMI)和用于地球观测系统的先进微波扫描辐射计(AMSR-E)的卫星衍生海表温度(SST)与非抽水近地表温度进行了比较(从Argo分析获得的NSTs漂浮在全球海洋上。检查了可能导致温度差异的因素,包括风速,柱状水蒸气,液态云水和地理位置。结果表明,TMI和AMSR-E SST与Argo NST高度相关;但是,在低风速下,它们平均比Argo NST温暖。在低风速下,TMI的性能比AMSR-E稍好,而在高风速下,TMI SST取回的校准效果可能较差。当柱状水蒸气低时,温度差表明TMI / AMSR-E的温度偏高,这可能表明TMI和AMSR-E SST在高纬度中均未得到很好的校准。黑潮延伸地区的SST变异性高于黑潮地区。春季,黑潮扩展区中,卫星探测的海温与Argo NST之间的温差变化较小。在低风速下,尽管TMI的性能比AMSR-E更好,但TMI和AMSR-E SST都无法很好地进行校准。

著录项

  • 来源
    《海洋学报(英文版)》 |2017年第3期|52-59|共8页
  • 作者单位

    National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, State Oceanic Administration, Beijing 100081, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China;

    Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China;

    Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China;

    National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, State Oceanic Administration, Beijing 100081, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:57:49
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号