首页> 外文学位 >Awareness and knowledge sharing in collaborative computing: Experimental methods.
【24h】

Awareness and knowledge sharing in collaborative computing: Experimental methods.

机译:协作计算中的意识和知识共享:实验方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research methods in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) are mostly imported from other disciplines, primarily psychology, social sciences, and computer science. The imported methods are generally used with little or no grounding in explicit theoretical models about collaboration; the measures considered are very heterogeneous (ranging from performance of individuals to practices of organizations) and not explicitly mapped onto investigated concepts; also, the overall methodology of the specific studies tends to be unilaterally oriented either toward naturalistic field methods or controlled laboratory methods. A number of CSCW researchers have pointed to some of these deficiencies, however, to date there has been no attempt to address these methodological deficiencies within an empirical program that incrementally investigates the same research construct.;This thesis addresses the problem of constructing appropriate research methods for studying awareness and knowledge sharing (common ground) in CSCW. It presents a research program: a sequence of studies on awareness and knowledge sharing intended as an instantiation of a new methodological approach. The approach has three characteristics: (1) Model-based: provides a mapping between conceptual models and methods; (2) Centered on group-level processes: the group is the unit of analysis and specific group processes are the focus of investigation; (3) Comprehensive in measurement: field and laboratory results are integrated and multiple measures of the same constructs are used.;The first half of the research program focused on activity awareness in CSCW. Drawing on the findings of a prior field study, a laboratory method was developed. A first lab study was devoted to validate the laboratory method and a second lab study provided detailed measurements of activity awareness. This study measured different aspects of the activity awareness construct, examined its relationship with known variables, and compared the effects of two CSCW systems, BRIDGE and Groove. The findings confirmed that many events tend to remain unnoticed in current systems. Key classes of factors affecting activity awareness included the properties of the event itself (e.g. distribution in time), the properties of the workspace (e.g. integration of content across tools, flexibility in navigation among the tools), the properties of the coworkers (e.g. metacognition, teamwork attitudes), and the properties of the group over time (e.g. amount of shared experience, increasing over time).;The second half of the program focused on common ground, a sub-process of activity awareness. Two laboratory experiments investigated the knowledge sharing process, respectively, in collocated teams using a paper prototype and in distributed teams using a software prototype. Subjective and objective measures in both studies showed that the amount of common ground increased as the shared experience increased (repeated task runs). The dialog patterns of the teams were also analyzed to understand the ways in which the increment in common ground occurred. While working together, the teammates developed not only shared knowledge about the content but also about the process and team strategies (i.e. how to do the task). As such process common ground was established, the teammates needed fewer explicit acts to regulate the process. As a result, the efforts were turned to building 'content common ground,' which led to greater efficiency. By comparing the results from the two experiments, specific effects of medium and setting were also identified. After presenting the results of the studies, the thesis discusses the proposed approach and specific experimental techniques developed and used in the program. Finally, the thesis draws some implications for future investigation and support of activity awareness and common ground.
机译:计算机支持的合作工作(CSCW)的研究方法大部分是从其他学科(主要是心理学,社会科学和计算机科学)中引入的。在有关协作的明确理论模型中,通常很少或根本没有使用导入的方法。所考虑的措施是非常不同的(从个人绩效到组织实践),并且没有明确地映射到所调查的概念上;同样,具体研究的整体方法论倾向于单方面地面向自然主义现场方法或受控实验室方法。许多CSCW研究人员已经指出了其中的一些不足,但是,迄今为止,还没有尝试在逐步研究同一研究结构的实证程序中解决这些方法上的缺陷。本论文解决了构建适当的研究方法的问题。研究CSCW中的意识和知识共享(共同点)。它提出了一个研究计划:一系列关于意识和知识共享的研究,旨在作为一种新方法论的实例。该方法具有三个特征:(1)基于模型:提供概念模型和方法之间的映射; (2)以小组级流程为中心:小组是分析的单位,特定的小组程序是调查的重点; (3)全面的测量:将现场和实验室结果整合在一起,并使用相同构造的多种测量方法。;研究计划的前半部分着重于CSCW中的活动意识。根据先前的现场研究发现,开发了一种实验室方法。第一个实验室研究致力于验证实验室方法,第二个实验室研究提供了对活动意识的详细测量。这项研究测量了活动意识构造的不同方面,检查了其与已知变量的关系,并比较了两个CSCW系统BRIDGE和Groove的效果。研究结果证实,许多事件在当前系统中往往未被注意到。影响活动意识的关键因素类别包括事件本身的属性(例如时间分布),工作空间的属性(例如跨工具的内容集成,工具间导航的灵活性),同事的属性(例如元认知) ,团队合作态度)以及小组随时间推移的属性(例如,共享经验的数量,随着时间的推移而增加)。;该计划的下半部分着眼于共同点,这是活动意识的子过程。两个实验室实验分别在纸质原型的并置团队和软件原型的分布式团队中研究了知识共享过程。两项研究中的主观和客观测量均表明,共同经验的数量随着共享经验的增加而增加(重复执行任务)。还分析了团队的对话模式,以了解共同点增加的发生方式。在一起工作时,队友不仅共享了有关内容的知识,而且还共享了有关流程和团队策略(即如何完成任务)的知识。建立了这样的过程共同点之后,队友需要更少的明确动作来规范过程。结果,努力转向建立“内容共同点”,从而提高了效率。通过比较两个实验的结果,还确定了培养基和设置的特定效果。在介绍了研究结果之后,论文讨论了提出的方法以及在程序中开发和使用的特定实验技术。最后,本文对未来的研究以及对活动意识和共同点的支持提供了一些启示。

著录项

  • 作者

    Convertino, Gregorio.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Information Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 信息与知识传播;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号