首页> 外文学位 >A Simple Twist of the Wrist: Presidential Usage of Executive Orders and Proclamations in times of Crisis, 1861-2012
【24h】

A Simple Twist of the Wrist: Presidential Usage of Executive Orders and Proclamations in times of Crisis, 1861-2012

机译:腕间的简单扭转:危机时期总统对行政命令和公告的使用,1861-2012年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The unilateral presidency has been an important vein of research in the study of the American Presidency over the past two decades. Scholars have studied why and how presidents use certain unilateral directives during their administrations. Institutional constraints by Congress and the Courts have been the primary explanation for a president's usage of unilateral directives. Few scholars have examined the effect that crises can have on these tools. Scholars have also primarily focused their attention on the use of executive orders and proclamations (to a lesser extent) in the post-World War II era. Few studies have examined how presidents before 1945 have used executive orders and proclamations. Using a dataset of over 2,500 directives, I examine when presidents, from 1861-2012, were more likely to issue significant executive orders and proclamations. In this dissertation, I empirically test my crisis theory of unilateral action. I test to see if crises cause presidents to issue more directives in the pre-modern era, modern era, and the full time frame. I also test the effect of the theory on these directives once they have been split into policy domains. I find that war and economic downturns cause presidents to issue more significant executive orders. Presidents issue more significant proclamations during economic downturns. War also causes presidents to issue more international executive orders, domestic orders/proclamations, and national sovereignty proclamations. Economic downturns cause them to issue more organizational orders, international orders/proclamations, and domestic proclamations. Natural disasters caused them to issue more domestic orders/proclamations and strikes caused them to issue more domestic proclamations. Overall, I find that presidential usage of unilateral directives is affected by certain types of crises and in some cases they have a stronger impact than the institutional variables.
机译:在过去的二十年中,单边主席制一直是美国总统制研究的重要研究脉络。学者们研究了总统在任职期间为何以及如何使用某些单方面指令。国会和法院的制度约束一直是总统使用单方面指令的主要解释。很少有学者研究过危机对这些工具的影响。在第二次世界大战后的时代,学者们还主要将注意力集中在行政命令和命令的使用上(较小程度上)。很少有研究研究1945年之前的总统如何使用行政命令和命令。通过使用2500多个指令的数据集,我研究了1861年至2012年的总统何时更有可能发布重要的行政命令和命令。本文以经验证明了我的单边行动危机理论。我测试一下危机是否会导致总统在前现代时代,现代时代以及整个时期内发布更多的指令。一旦将这些指令划分为策略域,我还将测试该指令对理论的影响。我发现战争和经济衰退导致总统下达了更重要的行政命令。总统在经济不景气时发布更重要的声明。战争还导致总统发布更多的国际行政命令,国内命令/声明和国家主权声明。经济不景气导致他们发布更多的组织命令,国际命令/声明和国内声明。自然灾害使他们发出了更多的国内命令/声明,而罢工使他们发出了更多的国内声明。总体而言,我发现总统对单方面指令的使用受到某些类型危机的影响,在某些情况下,它们的影响要大于制度变量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williams, Raymond T.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 311 p.
  • 总页数 311
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号