首页> 外文学位 >Crafting Community: Exploring Identity and Interaction through Ceramics in late Neolithic and early Bronze Age Northwestern China
【24h】

Crafting Community: Exploring Identity and Interaction through Ceramics in late Neolithic and early Bronze Age Northwestern China

机译:手工艺社区:在中国西北新石器时代晚期和青铜时代初期通过陶瓷探索身份和互动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation addresses questions related to craft production, social identity, and interaction through a multifaceted analysis of ceramic production and use during the Majiayao (3200-2000BC) and Qijia (2300-1500BC) periods in the Tao River Valley of northwestern China's Gansu Province. Situated between the Gobi Desert to the north and the foothills of the Tibetan Plateau to the south, for millennia this area acted as a key conduit for interaction between groups in central China and the Eurasian steppe. Majiayao and Qijia communities played a vital role in adopting, adapting, and retransmitting new domesticates, technologies, and ideas in both directions, helping shape the course of both Chinese and steppe civilization.;Despite these contributions to the development and spread of Chinese civilization, however, this region of northwest China is often pigeonholed into the trope of cultural devolution, with climatic shifts forcing a change from sophisticated Majiayao farmers to the small-scale, possibly pastoral societies of the Qijia. This conclusion is based almost entirely on shifts in pottery form and decoration, with the large, elaborately painted urns of the Majiayao period being replaced by the smaller, mostly undecorated pottery that defines the Qijia period. This dissertation challenges these conclusions by investigating the relationship between craft production, consumer and producer identity, and social interaction in order to provide a more nuanced understanding of the continuities and changes occurring between the two periods.;Taking a communities of practice based approach to ceramic production, this research focuses first on identifying potential groups of producers through assessment of paste recipes and forming techniques. In order to identify these groups, sherds from four Majiayao and Qijia habitation and mortuary contexts were sampled and analyzed using petrographic analysis. This technique provides information not only on the mineralogical makeup of a vessel, but also can provide insight into specific paste recipes and production techniques. This study revealed striking differences between vessels from mortuary and habitation contexts during the Majiayao period, pointing to the potential use of mortuary rituals for the negotiation and construction of relationships with other communities. It also demonstrated surprising continuity in production knowledge and techniques between the two periods, showing that changes in pottery form and decoration are not necessarily accurate reflections of underlying shifts in social identity.;In addition to petrographic analysis, whole vessels from mortuary contexts were also examined in order to assess how they were produced and used. Use-wear analysis was employed in order to understand the use histories of individual vessels, revealing that the majority of pots placed in graves during both periods were well used before interment. Standardization analysis was also carried out in order to explore potential production differences between various vessel types. It was demonstrated that while production does appear to vary between vessel types, there is impressive continuity in degree of vessel uniformity between the Majiayao and Qijia periods.;Combining the results of these three techniques, this research is able to address not only the communities of practice who were making these vessels, but also the potential roles they played in building and mediating relationships between groups. Specifically, for the northern Tao River Valley, it appears that despite significant shifts in pottery form, mortuary rituals, and the relationships that were mediated by these items and events, underlying communities of practice persisted over the course of more than 600 years.
机译:本文通过对中国西北地区甘肃省陶河流域的马家窑(3200-2000BC)和齐家(2300-1500BC)时期陶瓷生产和使用的多方面分析,探讨了与手工艺品生产,社会认同和相互作用有关的问题。位于北部的戈壁沙漠和南部的青藏高原的山​​麓之间,数千年来,该地区一直是中国中部各族群与欧亚草原之间相互作用的重要渠道。马家窑和齐家社区在双向采用,适应和传播新的家养,技术和观念方面发挥了至关重要的作用,有助于塑造中华文明和草原文明的进程。尽管这些为中华文明的发展和传播做出了贡献,但是,中国西北部的这个地区经常陷入文化转移的圈套之中,气候变化迫使人们从经验丰富的马加窑农民转变为齐家的小规模,可能是牧民社会。这个结论几乎完全基于陶器形式和装饰的变化,马家窑时期的大型,精美彩绘的被定义为齐家时期的较小的,大部分未装饰的陶器所代替。本论文通过调查手工艺品生产,消费者和生产者身份以及社会互动之间的关系来挑战这些结论,以便对这两个时期之间发生的连续性和变化有更细微的了解。生产方面,这项研究首先着重于通过评估浆料配方和成型技术来确定潜在的生产者群体。为了识别这些群体,对四个马家窑和齐家栖息地和太平间的羊皮进行了采样,并使用岩相分析法进行了分析。该技术不仅可以提供有关容器的矿物成分的信息,还可以提供对特定糊剂配方和生产技术的了解。这项研究揭示了在马加窑时期,葬场所和居住环境之间的船只之间存在显着差异,这表明葬仪式可用于与其他社区进行谈判和建立关系的潜在用途。它还显示了这两个时期之间生产知识和技术的惊人连续性,表明陶器形式和装饰的变化并不一定准确反映社会身份的根本变化。;除了岩相分析之外,还研究了来自停尸场的整个船只为了评估它们的生产和使用方式。为了了解各个容器的使用历史,进行了使用磨损分析,发现在这两个时期中放置在坟墓中的大多数花盆在被埋葬之前都得到了很好的利用。还进行了标准化分析,以探索各种容器类型之间的潜在生产差异。结果表明,尽管产量确实在不同类型的船上有所不同,但在马家窑和齐家时期,船的均一度仍具有令人印象深刻的连续性。结合这三种技术的结果,本研究不仅能够解决沙特阿拉伯的群落问题。练习制造这些船只的人,以及他们在建立和调解群体之间的关系中可能发挥的作用。具体而言,对于北部的陶河流域,看来尽管陶器形式,葬仪式以及由这些物品和事件所介导的关系发生了重大变化,但基本的实践社区仍持续了600多年。

著录项

  • 作者

    Womack, Andrew.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Archaeology.;East European studies.;Cultural anthropology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 491 p.
  • 总页数 491
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号