首页> 外文学位 >The third gate: Naturalization legislation in Eastern and Central Europe.
【24h】

The third gate: Naturalization legislation in Eastern and Central Europe.

机译:第三道门:东欧和中欧的入籍立法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Through citizenship laws, a state defines its population and identifies who belongs and who does not. This notion is intuitive, but how does a state decide who gets to be a member? Moreover, citizenship requirements vary dramatically around the globe. Thus, the central question of my study is this: why is it easier to become a citizen in some countries than in others?; Because the current understanding of citizenship issues is based primarily on analyses of the established democracies of the West, I expand the scope of these studies by investigating these issues in the post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. Many of these states are newly independent, allowing me to capture issues of citizenship at a founding moment for emerging democracies. They are addressing questions of nationhood and constitution-building for the first time in decades.; Once limited to places of transit migration, these states are now destinations for immigrants. Ethnic tensions, democratization, economic incentives, and newfound mobility are feeding migratory patterns. Yet these states are simply not accustomed to being terminuses for migration. Given their history and their present political and economic situations, they are poorly equipped to deal with these new demands.; I construct an analytical framework that remedies the lack of theoretical agenda in previous works on citizenship policy and law. My framework is composed of two differing perspectives on the central dynamics of naturalization legislating, one focusing on domestic factors and the other on international ones. My analysis of these approaches is informed by normative understandings of what membership should look like in liberal democracies.; My research combines cross-national analysis of data from 27 countries in Eastern and Central Europe with in-depth qualitative case studies of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. I single out these two countries for deeper research because they do not always follow the theoretical predictions. The multi-method approach I use enables me to first gain an understanding of the general patterns of the region before delving into an in-depth examination of particular cases.
机译:通过公民法,一个州定义了其人口,并确定了谁属于谁,谁不属于谁。这个想法很直观,但是国家如何决定谁成为成员呢?此外,全球对公民身份的要求差异很大。因此,我研究的中心问题是:为什么在某些国家比在其他国家更容易成为公民?因为当前对公民身份问题的理解主要是基于对西方已建立的民主国家的分析,所以我通过对后共产主义中欧和东欧的这些问题进行调查来扩大这些研究的范围。这些州中有许多是新独立的,使我能够在新兴民主国家成立之初抓住公民身份的问题。他们几十年来首次解决了民族和宪法建设的问题。这些州一度仅限于过境移民地点,现在已成为移民的目的地。种族紧张,民主化,经济刺激和新发现的流动性正在助长迁徙模式。但是,这些州根本不习惯于成为迁移的终点站。考虑到他们的历史以及目前的政治和经济状况,他们处理这些新需求的能力很差。我构建了一个分析框架,以弥补先前有关公民权政策和法律的工作中缺乏理论议程的问题。我的框架由关于归化立法动态的两种不同观点组成,一种观点关注国内因素,另一种关注国际因素。我对这些方法的分析是基于对自由民主制中的会员国应具有什么样的规范性理解。我的研究将对来自东欧和中欧27个国家的数据进行的跨国分析与对捷克共和国和斯洛伐克的深入定性案例研究相结合。我选择这两个国家进行更深入的研究,因为它们并不总是遵循理论上的预测。我使用的多方法方法使我能够先深入了解该地区的一般模式,然后再深入研究特定案例。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shadley, Anna.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号