首页> 外文学位 >Why pharmacists choose to seek or not seek board certification in pharmacy practice: A comparison of motivation and motivating factors.
【24h】

Why pharmacists choose to seek or not seek board certification in pharmacy practice: A comparison of motivation and motivating factors.

机译:为什么药剂师选择在药房实践中寻求或不寻求董​​事会认证:动机与动机因素的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The stated mission of the Board of Pharmaceutical Specialties (BPS) with regard to specialization is, via board certification, to recognize specialty areas, define skill standards for those specialty areas, and evaluate the knowledge and skills of individual Pharmacy specialists. The perceived or real benefits to the pharmacist of pursuing board certification are unknown. These benefits can be evaluated by separating into values (valences) and instrumentalities, the latter of which is the perceived or known probability that a performance will lead to an outcome. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the differences in values and instrumentalities perceived by the pharmacist, and differing calculated forces of motivation, using an Expectancy Valence equation, between board certified pharmacists and those who were not.A survey instrument, the Advanced Certification Index for Pharmacists (ACI-P), was designed to test instrumentalities, values, and calculated force of motivation. The ACI-P was deployed via electronic mail and the internet in cooperation with four major Pharmacy organizations and the Board of Pharmaceutical Specialties. Four direct comparisons between the two groups were completed. These were instrumentality, valence, valence-minus-instrumentality and valence-times-instrumentality. Additionally, the components of the valence and instrumentality products (the VI Scores) were multiplied by expectancy (anticipated chance of success of an effort leading to successful performance) resulting in a force of motivation calculation for each pharmacist's score.The ACI-P was deployed in the summer of 2007. Of the 2,274 pharmacists who began the survey, 2,129 completed all of the survey question sets for a completion percentage of 93.7%. A total of 2,057 of 2,129 completed surveys were retained for the research data representing a clean data rate of 96.6% of those completing all questions and 90.5% of those initiating the survey. This data set was comprised of 496 (24.1%) non-board certified pharmacists and 1,561 (75.9%) board certified pharmacists.Validation and reliability of the ACI-P was confirmed via parallel axis analysis and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. There were two factors or domains found in the data and these were Professional, Career and Personal (PCP) and Financial Support (FS). Cronbach's alpha for the PCP factor or domain was 0.94 and the FS domain had an alpha of 0.81. The constructs were validated and the items addressed within the constructs of PCP and FS were reliable. The overall Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for the ACI-P was 0.94.In the four major comparisons, there were significant differences between non-board certified and board certified pharmacists.The primary value used for the motivational force calculation was based on valence-times-instrumentality-times-expectancy. The valence-times-instrumentality value was the VI score or VIS. The summed VI scores for the non-board certified pharmacists were in general lower (303.54 SD 101) than those for the board certified pharmacists (343.82 SD 83), and these were statistically different (t= -8.03, p.0001).The overall expectancy mean for non-board certified pharmacists was 4.05 and 4.4 for board certified pharmacists (5-point Likert scale), and these were significantly different (t = -9.16, p.0001).The overall motivational force calculated using the ACI-P scoring methodology yielded a force of motivation to seek board certification of 1249 (95% CI 1201-1296) for non-board certified pharmacists and 1521 (95% CI 1499-1544) for board certified pharmacists. The differences were statistically significant. (t=10.15, p=0.001). A tipping point in the range of 1500-1520 was identified that would indicate a 95% probability that a pharmacist scoring in this range would be a board certified pharmacist.The results of this study show that there were significant differences in motivational factors between non-board certified pharmacists and those that were board certified with the latter scoring higher on nearly every measure. The ACI-P survey instrument was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of the force of motivation for pharmacists to seek board certification.
机译:药品专业委员会(BPS)关于专业化的既定任务是通过董事会认证来识别专业领域,为这些专业领域定义技能标准,并评估各个药学专家的知识和技能。追求药剂师认证对药剂师的感觉或实际好处尚不清楚。可以通过将价值(价)和工具分离来评估这些好处,后者是绩效将导致结果的感知或已知概率。这项研究的主要目的是确定期望药剂师认为的价值观和工具之间的差异,以及通过期望价方程确定的药剂师与未认可的药剂师之间所计算出的不同的动力。药剂师索引(ACI-P)旨在测试工具,价值和计算出的动力。与四个主要的药房组织和药品专业委员会合作,通过电子邮件和互联网部署了ACI-P。两组之间完成了四次直接比较。这些是工具性,化合价,化合价-负-工具性和化合价-时间-工具性。此外,效价和工具性产品的组成部分(VI得分)乘以期望值(预期成功的成功机会导致成功的表现),从而为每位药剂师的得分计算出了动力.ACI-P被部署在2007年夏天。在开始调查的2274名药剂师中,有2129名完成了所有调查问题集,占完成率的93.7%。总共保留了2,129份已完成调查的2,057份研究数据,占完成所有问题的人数的96.6%,发起调查的人数的90.5%。该数据集由496位(24.1%)非董事会认证的药剂师和1,561位(75.9%)董事会认证的药剂师组成.ACI-P的验证和可靠性通过平行轴分析和Cronbach'sα可靠性系数得到确认。数据中有两个因素或领域,分别是专业人员,职业和个人(PCP)和财务支持(FS)。 Cronbach对于PCP因子或域的alpha为0.94,而FS域的alpha为0.81。对构建体进行了验证,PCP和FS的构建体中涉及的项目是可靠的。 ACI-P的总体Cronbach's alpha可靠性系数为0.94。在四项主要比较中,非董事会认证的药剂师和董事会认证的药剂师之间存在显着差异。用于激励力计算的主要值基于效价倍数-工具时间期望。价-时间-仪器值是VI得分或VIS。未经董事会认证的药剂师的VI得分总和(303.54 SD 101)通常低于经过董事会认证的药剂师(343.82 SD 83)的得分,并且在统计上是不同的(t = -8.03,p <0001)。非委员会认证药剂师的总体预期均值分别为4.05和4.4(5点Likert量表),差异显着(t = -9.16,p <0001)。使用ACI-计分方法产生了一种动力,即寻求非董事会认证的药剂师的董事会认证为1249(95%CI 1201-1296),董事会认证药剂师的认证为1521(95%CI 1499-1544)。差异具有统计学意义。 (t = 10.15,p = <0.001)。确定了1500-520范围内的临界点,表明在该范围内得分的药剂师将获得董事会认证的药剂师的概率为95%。这项研究的结果表明,非激励因素之间的动机因素存在显着差异董事会认证的药剂师和那些获得董事会认证的药剂师在几乎所有指标上的得分都更高。事实证明,ACI-P调查工具是评估药剂师寻求董事会认证的动力的有效且可靠的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tankersley, Mark A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Tennessee Health Science Center.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Tennessee Health Science Center.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Pharmacy.Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 206 p.
  • 总页数 206
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号