首页> 外文学位 >Essays on the information acquisition of doubt-prone decision makers.
【24h】

Essays on the information acquisition of doubt-prone decision makers.

机译:有关易疑决策者信息获取的论文。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are many situations in which individuals have a choice of whether or not to observe the eventual outcome. In these instances, individuals often prefer to avoid observing the outcome. The standard von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) Expected Utility model cannot accommodate these cases, since it does not distinguish between lotteries for which outcomes are observed by the agent and lotteries for which they are not. I develop an axiomatic model that admits preferences for observing the outcome or remaining in doubt. I then use this model to analyze the connection between the agent's attitude towards risk, doubt, and what I refer to as 'optimism'. This framework accommodates a wide array of field and experimental observations that violate the vNM model, and that may not seem related, prima facie. For instance, this framework accommodates self-handicapping, in which an agent chooses to impair his own performance. Unlike other frameworks, this model accommodates self-handicapping without using notions of self-deception, cognitive dissonance and belief manipulation. It also admits a status quo bias without having recourse to framing effects or reference points. Furthermore, this framework accommodates behavior associated with anticipated regret, the Allais paradox and preferences for smaller menus, which are all difficult to reconcile with the vNM framework. In financial settings, this model accommodates a safe allocation bias, in which agents choose neither to buy nor short sell an asset for an interval of prices; this behavior has so far been explained using ambiguity aversion, which this model does not allow. Recently, experiments have been conducted in which dictators in dictator games who seem to exhibit preferences for fairness often switch to the selfish choice if they can avoid observing the recipients allocation. While the empirical findings of these experiments are difficult to reconcile either with models of Expected Utility or models of fairness, they fit the predictions of this model well. This framework accommodates all the well-known observations mentioned here and others described in the papers with a single, natural extension of the standard vNM model, and using the same assumption on preferences throughout.
机译:在许多情况下,个人可以选择是否观察最终结果。在这些情况下,个人通常倾向于避免观察结果。标准的冯·诺依曼·摩根斯滕(vNM)期望效用模型不能适应这些情况,因为它无法区分由代理商观察到结果的彩票和没有观察到结果的彩票。我开发了一个公理模型,该模型接受了观察结果或存在疑问的偏好。然后,我使用此模型来分析代理人对风险,疑问和我所谓的“乐观”态度之间的联系。该框架可容纳各种各样的领域和实验观察结果,这些发现违背了vNM模型,而且表面上看起来并不相关。例如,此框架可容纳自我障碍,在这种障碍中,代理人选择削弱自己的表现。与其他框架不同,此模型可适应自我障碍,而无需使用自我欺骗,认知失调和信念操纵等概念。它还承认现状偏差,而无需求助于帧效应或参考点。此外,该框架适应了与预期遗憾,Allais悖论以及对较小菜单的偏好相关的行为,这些菜单与vNM框架很难协调。在金融环境中,该模型适应了安全分配偏差,即代理商在一定的价格区间内既不选择购买资产也不选择卖空资产。到目前为止,此行为已使用歧义厌恶进行了解释,该模型不允许这样做。最近,进行了一些实验,在这些实验中,似乎表现出对公平的偏爱的独裁者游戏中的独裁者如果能够避免观察接受者的分配,往往会转向自私的选择。尽管这些实验的经验结果很难与“预期效用”模型或“公平”模型相吻合,但它们非常符合该模型的预测。该框架通过标准vNM模型的单个自然扩展,并在整个偏爱中使用相同的假设,来容纳此处提到的所有知名观察以及本文中描述的其他观察。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alaoui, Larbi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号