首页> 外文学位 >Affective processing in major depressive disorder: Neuroanatomical correlates of state and trait abnormalities.
【24h】

Affective processing in major depressive disorder: Neuroanatomical correlates of state and trait abnormalities.

机译:严重抑郁症的情感处理:状态和特质异常的神经解剖学关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Patients with MDD demonstrate impairments in various components of affective processing, which are believed to persist in the remitted phase of the illness and are believed to underlie the vulnerability for future relapse. Despite advances in neuropsychiatry, the neuroanatomical site of action of various treatment modalities remains unclear, leaving clinicians without an algorithm to guide optimal treatment selection for individual patients.;Based on previous neuroimaging investigations and preclinical animal data, we hypothesized that increased activation of the amygdala and the pregenual cingulate during negative affect induction (NAI), and decreased activity of the ventral striatum during positive affect induction (PAI), would differentiate ultimate NR from RS. Following the first scan, treatment with fluoxetine and olanzapine was initiated in the MDD group, with follow-up scans at one- and six-weeks thereafter. We hypothesized that decreases in depressive symptoms would be associated with decreased activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala during NAI and increased activation of the hippocampus during PAI.;Eleven MDD subjects met criteria for clinical remission at study endpoint. Based on trait differences between MDD and HC, we hypothesized that differences observed during NAI would be limited to brain regions involved in regulation of the affective state, including the dorsolateral PFC and the anterior midcingulate cortex.;The results of the analyses confirmed the a-prior hypotheses and additionally demonstrated differential activation of the insular, medial temporal, and premotor cortex during repeat PAI and NAI between HC, RS, and NR. These findings provide: i) a neuroanatomical target of successful antidepressant therapy during PAI/NAI; ii) a differential effect of depressive symptoms and dispositional affect on brain activation during PAI/NAI; and iii) an a-prior method to differentiate RS from NR, and iv) demonstrate the need for additional treatment to prevent relapse in the remitted state.;This thesis sought to characterize differences in brain activation during affective processing between MDD treatment responders (RS) and non-responders (NR) by combining clinical and neuroimaging variables in a repeat-measure functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigation. We induced increases in positive and negative affect using visual stimuli under fMRI conditions in 21 MDD subjects and 18 healthy controls (HC).
机译:患有MDD的患者表现出情感加工各个方面的损伤,据认为在疾病缓解阶段持续存在,并被认为是未来复发的脆弱性的基础。尽管神经精神病学取得了进步,但各种治疗方式在神经解剖学上的作用部位仍不清楚,因此临床医生缺乏指导个体患者最佳治疗选择的算法。基于先前的神经影像学研究和临床前动物数据,我们假设杏仁核的激活增加负效应诱导(NAI)期间的前扣带回以及正效应诱导(PAI)期间腹侧纹状体活性的降低将使最终NR与RS区别开来。第一次扫描后,在MDD组中开始用氟西汀和奥氮平治疗,此后在1周和6周进行随访扫描。我们假设抑郁症状的减轻将与NAI期间腹侧前额叶皮层(PFC)和杏仁核的激活减少以及PAI期间海马的激活增加有关; 11名MDD受试者在研究终点达到临床缓解的标准。基于MDD和HC之间的性状差异,我们假设NAI期间观察到的差异仅限于涉及情感状态调节的大脑区域,包括背外侧PFC和前扣带回皮层。;分析结果证实a-之前的假设,并另外证明了在HC,RS和NR之间重复进行PAI和NAI期间,岛突,颞内侧和运动前皮层的差异激活。这些发现提供了:i)在PAI / NAI期间成功进行抗抑郁治疗的神经解剖学目标; ii)在PAI / NAI期间,抑郁症状和性格倾向对大脑激活的影响不同; iii)一种将RS与NR区别开来的现有方法,并且iv)证明需要采取其他治疗措施来预防缓解状态的复发。;本论文旨在描述MDD治疗应答者(RS)在情感加工过程中大脑激活的差异)和无反应者(NR),方法是在重复测量功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中结合临床和神经影像变量。我们在fMRI条件下使用视觉刺激在21位MDD受试者和18位健康对照(HC)中诱导了正面和负面影响的增加。

著录项

  • 作者

    Konarski, Jakub Zbigniew.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Biology Neuroscience.;Psychology Physiological.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 326 p.
  • 总页数 326
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号