首页> 外文学位 >Economic tradeoff between purchase of medical care and other commodities in the USA.
【24h】

Economic tradeoff between purchase of medical care and other commodities in the USA.

机译:在美国购买医疗保健产品和其他商品之间的经济平衡。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the area of medication use decision making, little research using an economic framework is available to understand what kind of tradeoffs people make when deciding whether to purchase medication as well as the nature of economic constraints and choices that influence the trade-off process. The objective of the study is to understand how people allocate their budget between different groups of goods they use for daily living, given the assumption that the allocation helps them to achieve maximum utility or satisfaction. Another purpose is to understand how people belong to different socioeconomic groups respond to the change in price of different commodities.;Our study analyzed out-of-pocket expenditure from Consumer Expenditure Survey along with Consumer Price Index from 1996 until 2005 to understand how the demand was influenced by change in price of commodities and consumers' income. The sample size of 89,945 consumer units represented the households belonging to non-institutional, civilian U.S. population. Multiple OLS regressions analysis and Tobit regressions were used as statistical tools for analysis.;Major finding includes with the increase in own price, compensated demand decreased. Food, housing, apparel, transportation, medical care, recreation, education are normal goods. Medical care demand was inelastic and had low income elasticity. All goods except transportation were complement to medical care. Analysis of subgroups revealed that demand of medical care increased with age and Caucasians had a higher demand compared to African-Americans. Poor people were found to be most sensitive to increase in the price of medical care for basic necessities like food, housing and medical care. If demand for medical care can act as a proxy to access and availability of medical care, it could be inferred that based on out-of-pocket expenditure (including health insurance premium) poor people most affected by price increase, which could influence their health outcomes. As lack of nutrition, good housing and medical care influence health outcomes in negative way, reduction of income inequality could increase affordability of basic necessities to indigent population and could create better health outcomes at population level.
机译:在药物使用决策方面,很少有使用经济框架的研究来了解人们在决定是否购买药物时会进行什么样的权衡,以及影响权衡过程的经济约束和选择的性质。这项研究的目的是了解人们如何在他们用于日常生活的不同商品组之间分配预算,假设分配可以帮助他们实现最大的效用或满意度。另一个目的是了解不同社会经济群体的人们如何应对不同商品价格的变化。我们的研究分析了1996年至2005年消费者支出调查的自付费用以及消费者价格指数,以了解需求受商品价格和消费者收入变化的影响。样本量为89,945个消费单位,代表属于非机构性美国平民的家庭。多元OLS回归分析和Tobit回归被用作分析的统计工具。;主要发现包括随着自身价格的上涨,补偿需求的减少。食品,住房,服装,交通,医疗,娱乐,教育是正常商品。医疗需求缺乏弹性,收入弹性较低。除运输以外的所有商品都是医疗的补充。对亚组的分析显示,与非裔美国人相比,医疗需求随年龄增长而增加,而高加索人具有更高的需求。人们发现穷人对食品,住房和医疗等基本必需品的医疗价格上涨最为敏感。如果对医疗的需求可以代替获得和提供医疗服务,则可以推断出,根据自付费用(包括健康保险费),受价格上涨影响最大的穷人,这可能会影响他们的健康结果。由于缺乏营养,良好的住房和医疗服务会对健康状况产生负面影响,减少收入不平等现象可能会增加基本需求对贫困人口的承受能力,并可能在人口水平上产生更好的健康状况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mukherjee, Kumar.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Pharmacy.;Economics General.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 108 p.
  • 总页数 108
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号