首页> 外文学位 >Macroeconomics and the composition of modern economic government: Towards a critical sociology of economics.
【24h】

Macroeconomics and the composition of modern economic government: Towards a critical sociology of economics.

机译:宏观经济学与现代经济政府的组成:迈向经济学的批判社会学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation argues that sociological critiques of economics must take better account of this latter's role as a practical tool of economic policy management. In this respect, economics helps to constitute real economies, rather than merely reflecting them. This is particularly so with macroeconomics, which came together in the first half of the 20th century and which provided a picture of the economy which made state intervention possible. Business cycle theory and later macroeconomics were originally conceived as tools for stabilizing economic flows, and thus reducing the negative social outcomes associated with depressions. This tool, however, made its ultimate ends the result of proper technical manipulation of the economy, specifically around attempts to stabilize the price level. This had a de-politicizing effect on economic policy, as management of the economy was encased in specific technical imperatives which masked the social relations of economic organization. Ultimately, these technical imperatives have come to dominate over the mediation role that macroeconomics was assigned in the middle of the 20th century. Thus, by the early 21st century, we are unable to envisage alternatives to neoliberal economic policies, which privilege price stability and free trade over employment and material equality. This leaves economics in a perilous position as the gap between rich and poor makes evident new tensions within the emerging global economy---the re-emergence of social problems to which current macroeconomics offers few if any solutions. The dissertation argues for a politicization of economic knowledge, and for a clearer understanding of the value rational content of some of the concepts and categories of macroeconomics. Through a clearer understanding of the social construction of apparently natural objects of economic analysis, it is possible to conceive of new ways in which the economy might be organized.
机译:论文认为,经济学的社会学评论必须更好地考虑后者作为经济政策管理的实用工具的作用。在这方面,经济学有助于构成实体经济,而不仅仅是反映它们。在20世纪上半叶出现的宏观经济学中尤其如此,它提供了使国家干预成为可能的经济图景。商业周期理论和后来的宏观经济学最初被认为是稳定经济流动,从而减少与萧条相关的负面社会结果的工具。但是,此工具的最终目的是对经济进行适当的技术操纵,尤其是围绕稳定价格水平的尝试。这对经济政策产生了非政治化的影响,因为经济管理被掩盖了掩盖经济组织社会关系的特定技术要求所包围。最终,这些技术势力已经主导了20世纪中期宏观经济学被赋予的调解作用。因此,到21世纪初,我们无法设想新自由主义经济政策的替代方案,该方案优先考虑价格稳定和自由贸易,而不是就业和物质平等。由于富国和穷国之间的鸿沟在新兴的全球经济中明显出现了新的紧张局势,这使经济学处于危险境地-社会问题的重新出现,当前的宏观经济学对此几乎没有提供任何解决方案。论文主张将经济知识政治化,对宏观经济学的某些概念和范畴的价值理性内容有更清晰的理解。通过对显然是经济分析的自然对象的社会结构的更清晰的理解,可以构想出经济组织的新方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hayes, Matthew F.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Economics History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 427 p.
  • 总页数 427
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号