首页> 外文学位 >On the founding of poetry in Shelley and Holderlin: A study of the poem-play.
【24h】

On the founding of poetry in Shelley and Holderlin: A study of the poem-play.

机译:雪莱和霍德林的诗歌创作:对诗歌戏剧的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Our thesis contains a double problematic: on the one hand, we contextualize philosophical problems within literary genre and on the other hand, we concern ourselves with the question of genre. More specifically, we rethink the poetic, dramatic corpus of Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822) and Friedrich Hölderlin (1770-1843) around the concept of the poem-play, a term that we invented to show the generic, conceptual and figural relations within literary form. In this respect we take a dialectical approach, one that refers back to the antinomy of Kant and reemerges in twentieth century interpretations of genre discernable in the writings of Walter Benjamin, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Theodor Adorno and Giorgio Agamben. The poetic, dramatic works which are the center of our study are Hölderlin's Der Tod des Empedokles ("The Death of Empedokles") (1798-1800), his translation of Sophocles' Antigone (1804) (in particular, the lyrical dialogues and choral odes) and Shelley's Prometheus Unbound (1820). In addition, we examine each poet’s theoretical writings on genre, highlighting especially the relation of tragedy and the lyric. As a literary genre, the poem-play, which doesn't exist, connotes many things: problem-play, mixed, dual, composite, fragmentary, or hybrid genre; assemblage, totality, etc. We like to think of it as a border genre because this allows us to explore the different levels of relation alluded to above. In the history of Romantic criticism and interpretation there have been surprisingly little comparative studies dedicated to Shelley and Hölderlin. Moreover, to our knowledge, there are no existent studies which have focused on each poet's respective affinities to poetic, dramatic forms. Hence, we hope that our research will open up new paths in the domains of Shelley and Hölderlin criticism in addition to inviting further work on the antinomical tendencies in genre within and beyond the Romantic canon.
机译:我们的论文包含一个双重问题:一方面,我们将文学体裁中的哲学问题情境化;另一方面,我们关注体裁问题。更具体地说,我们围绕诗歌游戏的概念重新思考珀西·比谢·雪莱(Percy Bysshe Shelley,1792-1822年)和弗里德里希·霍尔德林(FriedrichHölderlin,1770-1843年)的诗意,戏剧性的语料,我们发明了这个词来表示一般,概念和形象的关系。在文学形式上。在这方面,我们采取了一种辩证的方法,一种追溯到康德的对立性,并重新出现在二十世纪对沃尔特·本杰明,菲利普·拉科·拉巴特,西奥多·阿多尔诺和乔治·阿甘本的著作中可辨别的体裁的解释中。我们研究的诗意,戏剧性作品是霍尔德林的《德·托德·德·恩佩多克斯的死》(“死于恩佩多克斯”)(1798-1800年),他翻译的《 Sophocles的安提戈涅》(1804年)(特别是抒情对话和合唱)颂歌)和雪莱的《普罗米修斯无极限》(1820)。此外,我们检查了每位诗人关于体裁的理论著作,特别着重强调悲剧与抒情诗的关系。作为一种文学体裁,不存在的诗歌游戏蕴涵着许多东西:问题体裁,混合,双重,复合,零碎或混合体。我们喜欢将其视为边界类型,因为这使我们能够探索上文提到的不同层次的关系。在浪漫主义批评和解释的历史上,很少有关于雪莱和荷尔德林的比较研究。而且,据我们所知,目前还没有研究集中在每位诗人对诗歌,戏剧形式的各自亲和力上。因此,我们希望我们的研究将在雪莱和霍尔德林的批评领域开辟新的道路,并邀请浪漫主义经典内外的流派的反古典倾向进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Horan, Jennifer.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature English.;Philosophy.;Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 436 p.
  • 总页数 436
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号